Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

FUSION PROPOSALS

(To the Editor.)

Sir,—The decision of tho Kefovm .Party not to accept Mr. Forbes's proposals ior a union of forces is a matter tor proioimd regret. It is folly to go back to past history of political-.warfare .m New Zealand as was clearly pointed out in your able leader last ■ night, in. view of the changed conditions of to-day. Mr. Coates s offer, is, "Be guided by us during the coming session, and when the election follows we will fight you for all we are worth!" And what will be the result? With the moderate forces divided, Labour's opportunity may come, and a repetition o£. Australia's tragedy may follow. Let there be no doubt —Labour will poll its ' heaviest ■ vote at next election. Its avowed policy during the emergency session, right through, was to harden the workers round its banner; and they are in an undoubted majority in the country. Therefore, it behoves the moderates to get together and present a united front. Mr. Forbes has done his part. I and many others still hope tlie Reform Party will respond and accept his overtures. What 1 think is needed is some leading man or men to act as intermediaries, as was_ the case with tbc- formation of the National War Cabinet.—l am,'etc., . ... ■ COUNTRY BEFORE PARTY. ' (To the" Editor.) Sir, —You can have no idea of the sigh of relief which all true Reformers gave when Mr. Coates's statement regarding fusion was made "public. We are thankful that our party is led by a man. We are proud of our party, its ideals, its past, its leader, and its future, and to throw all this away, as a very doubtful, solution of a temporary trouble, seemed to us to be sacrificing too much.. My fear was this: I know the inside of the party, and I know the viewpoint of Mr. Coates—the country's interest and not self. The public will soon realise that to have fused would have been to throw away, the substance in an attempt to grasp the1 shadow. The reply will appeal to every sporting sense, and only the jealously-interested will quibble.—l am, etc.,

PROUD EEFOEMEE

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP19310507.2.43

Bibliographic details

Evening Post, Volume CXI, Issue 106, 7 May 1931, Page 10

Word Count
360

FUSION PROPOSALS Evening Post, Volume CXI, Issue 106, 7 May 1931, Page 10

FUSION PROPOSALS Evening Post, Volume CXI, Issue 106, 7 May 1931, Page 10

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert