Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image

ANSWEItS TO COKUESI'OXDKXTS. "A Socialist."—We liavo m:ulo inquiries into your coniiilnltits, anil have Iktii Informed by the umci.-ils that they i-imiint understand how, if you have been unemployed, you liuvo ruceieil no work, as nil men who have applied have had work (,'lven them. Wo are informed that an organised system of allocating work is in operation, and that particulars relating to encasement arc displayed. C.31.— (1) The pension is the same; hut a woman may receive a pension at tins ago of CO, whereas a man must have reached the ago of 63. The pension of a woman, however, is redneed by £1 for each year under the ace of (ij. At 05 a woman receives the same pension as a man. (2) It is provided in the Cemeteries Act that a person may leave, directions for his body to be cremated. Tiio Act, however, does not expressly state that a body cannot he cremated without such direction. In any case tliero are certain formalities to be complied with as safeguards before cremation. "Zero."—'A very difficult problem. Tho amount has been fixed by regulation. "Property Owner." Admittedly an unfortunate position for you. Would it not bo better to place the facts before tho chairman of the Institute? "Disappointed Bandsman."—Similar views have been published In "The Post." Now that the decision has been made further protests cannot achieve much. "Four Pounds a Week."—Similar views have been expressed In our correspondence columns. Ie Horo. —Wo are assured the question was not meant In a carping spirit. Tho point you mako has been noted. "A Mother."—Received. It is difficult for a newspaper to investigate personal cases. "Disgusted."—Wo have drawn the "attention of tho authorities to your complaint. "Not a Wage-Earner."—lt is doubtful if tho proposal would help unless there was a corresponding reduction in payment.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP19310218.2.51.2

Bibliographic details

Evening Post, Volume CXI, Issue 41, 18 February 1931, Page 8

Word Count
303

Page 8 Advertisements Column 2 Evening Post, Volume CXI, Issue 41, 18 February 1931, Page 8

Page 8 Advertisements Column 2 Evening Post, Volume CXI, Issue 41, 18 February 1931, Page 8

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert