CIVIL CASES
i. Judsmcnfc for plaintiff by default was Ipiven by Mv..J. 8. Barton, S.M, » the Magistrate's Court yesteidny m the following undefended ciul- cases:— > Traders' Finance Coiporatiou, Ltd. v. \. D. M'Kinley,.£Bo 5s 8d; New Zealand Dairyman Co., Ltd. v. W. J. Tornll, « 17<! 6fl- C G Watt v. li. James, 10s 6d; i \ Levy Ltd. v. R. M. Martin, £12 7.; V HarfeV Moseley v. H. Wackrow (sep cst) £9 ss; Wellingtou Builders' and General Labourers' Union v. W. -A. Clarke £1 Us 6d; A. S. Paterson and Co., | Ltd. X L- J: Connolly £16 5s 8d; Cxty I Corporation v. Robert Johnson, £16 18s lid; ric6t : Brbs.. Ltd.v. C. B. Matthew., costs only;-18s; A. Hayhoe vA. M'Crory,1 £18 We; Dominion Portrait Co. v. i. Vucich sep. est.), £2'l3s; O. Milieu Paulin v.' Stuart Roberts, £2 2s; George and Doughty, Ltd. v. V. Moms (sep. cat.), £1 4s (A; White Star Tourist Services, Ltd v E. S."Thomas,-£]6 14s 6d;'lsew Zealand Express Co Ltd v. F. H. Rennie, Od-' C. C. Wakefield and Co. v. H. Palmer, £7 4s- C S. Headland w. Pat Graham, £i lls 6d; Carr's Commercial College v. Peggy Bate £6; X H. Hardwick v. W. Blows, £12 6s 2d; Dominion Portrait Co. v. A. R. Coad (sep, £9 10s; Dominion Portrait Co. v. E. Woodsford (&ep. estO, £3 4s 6d; Dominion .Portrait Co. v. h. U Elliott (sep. cst.), £i Is; Dominion Portrait Co. v. M. Trengrovc (sep. cst), £1; X J Hyams, D. Ca^elbcrg, and W. \j. Rothenberg v. R. J. Grinlinton, £26 10s; Daisy D. Waddell v. Philip Litting, £13 15s; George and Doughty, Ltd. v. W. Parcnson, £2 8s 3d; Gruai'f. Electrical and Battery Services, Ltd. v. G. H. Stupples, £7 lls 6d; City -Corporation \: A. A. Wallace, £S; City Corporation v. T. R. Finlay, Ltd., £35; The Crown v. Alexander Frank Hanbnian, £-2 17s-6d; G. and S Lamb v. T. Ljons, £9; Keuuer's, Ltd. v. Joe Molloy, 12s; Mohcley Eurek.i Ltd. v. J. A. M'Grath, £8; M. A. Traynor v. H. A. H.m kins and Eva Hawkins (sep. cst.). £10 ss; Thompson Bros., Ltd. v. E. Goodwin, £7 7k 9d; Wellington Typographical Union v. T. P. O'Donnell, £3 3s. 6d; F. W. Boud v. Roy Gandy, £3 10s; W. J. Scammell v. W. Brown, £3; Universal Film Manufacturing Co. (Australasia), Ltd. v. W. J. Bums, £18 10s 8d; Electrolux, Ltd. v. A. E. Pentecost (fccp. est.), £13 9s; C. and A. Odlin Timber and Hardware Co., Ltd. v. Keamgo Kingi,' £2 0s 4d; T~. IT. Gates v. Charles C. Sonflleet, £5 3s; S. R. White v. Ernest Cartwright, £2 15s; Hart Pennington, Ltd. v, Gardiner Bios., £T 2s Cd; E. J. Gentles v. J. Rice, £7 ss; 11. Leitch v. H. Robinson, £3 ss; Wuingawa Meat Co. v. A. Stanit'ord (sep. cst.), £1 3s lOd; Famous Las,ky Film Setviee (N.Z.), Ltd. v. H. H. FiUherbert, £8 Is 6d; Public Trustee v. Thomas Nonis Baker, £26.
The largest collection firm in New Zealand is the Dominion Mercantile Agency, Ltd., of Wellington, Auckland, and Christchurch, with agents in every New Zealand town, and associate offices throughput the world.—Advi.
CIVIL CASES
Evening Post, Volume CX, Issue 115, 12 November 1930, Page 6
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Evening Post. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in