IN DIVORCE
FIXTURES FOR SESSIONS
The following divorce cases are set down for hcariug.at the quarterly "sessions of the Wellington Supreme Court, opening on Tuesday: — Before Judge and Jury. liornanl Leo iilair v. Mary liliiir, alleged iidultcry. i Before a Judge Alone. Defended Catu-.s. . j It.irold John Mutchinson v. Jl.iy. \;ic- ! turi.i Ilutchiußou, restitution of conjugal rights; lieorge yydncy L'evick v. Kuby Levick, alleged separation; Lilliau Euuice O'Xcill James O'Xeill, iilleged de^er- I tiou; Cyril Johnson v. Doris, Louisa John- j I eon, alleged desertion. • . j Undefended Cases. j Isobel. Klora Johueou v. lieiijaiiiin Thomas Johnson, alleged tepaf.itiou; tjiducy Victor .Wright v. Jane Ami Wright, alleged separation; Kosie Parker v. tiaville Clifl'ord Parker, alleged separation; Henry Robert Gilbert v. Koeetta Maud Gilbert, alleged adultery; Bertha Leathart Burnside v. Douglas Burnsidc, alleged desertion; Charles Henry James Scott v.. Mclva Edith. Dorothy Scott, alleged .desertion; Frank Charles Ogg v. Edith Cecilia Ogg, alleged separation; Philip Joseph May. v. .Matilda May, .alleged desertiou; Flora Elizabeth Jane Oakey v. Arthur Oakey, alleged desertion and failure to maintain, etc.; Eric Albert Clark v. Edna Robin Clark, alleged desertion; Vivian Hector Karl Perkins v. Fanny Perkins, alleged desertion; Kenneth Hilton Wolland v. Emily' Doris Valeric Wolland, alleged separation; Marcus Riske v. Doris Elizabeth lliske. restitution of conjugal rights; Isabel Maud Lament v.' George Charles bamont., alleged separation: . Ann Haycrolt Thomas v. George 'William Thomas, alleged de&ertion;' -Herbert Stanley Bruce Gilbertso-n "v. Aunie Gilbertsou, alleged desertion; Marcus' Philip Pool v; Queeuie Pool, alleged adultery;' Winifred Mary SteM-art,:.v.. Francis'..OgiMe Stewart,.. alleged separation; Olga.Edua Madge Daly v. Tom Ainewprth Daly, alleged desertion; Mary Gn-eneth Walsh v. Francis Matthew Walsh, alleged separation and desertion.; Colin Campbell v. Eileen Ivy Doreen Campbell, alleged adultery; Kathleen Annie Olsen -v. Arthur' Wilfred Olsen, alleged -.desertion;' Beatrice Dorothy Anderson v. Walter Hugh" Anderson,' restitution of conjugal rights; Annie Hudson v. Samuel Frank: Hudson, alleged adultery; Gladys Jessie- Shotton: v. Ernest Shotton, alleged-desertion; Elsie ■ Josephine- Croniu1 v. Ber.tran'4 'Crbnih, ■alleged desertion; Grace Elizabeth Helen Pooley v. Charles Edward Pooley, alleged'separation'; leobel May,,-Rielly v. Vincent William James Rielly, alleged desertion; Charles Robert.'Bidwill v.. Marie. Thelma Bidwill, alleged adultery; Elizabeth Travis v,. Charles; Alexander• Travis,- alleged: desertion; .Ernest iHoward ... Garrett ,v. Mabel - Evelyn . Garrett, .alleged separa--tion;, John ; Stafford Cummbck v. Ifary Ella Cumrnock, alleged adultery: John Robert Holland v. ; Pearl •Holland, alleged adultery; Charles .Qttb,.'Haase' v. Catherine' 'Elizabeth' Haase, allaged desertion; Augustus Burke v. Edna Kathleen Burke, alleged desertion; Isabella English Higgins v. David Higgins.'alleged separation; Le'win John Roberta v. Jeannie Roberts, alleged- adultery.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP19301025.2.114
Bibliographic details
Evening Post, Volume CX, Issue 100, 25 October 1930, Page 14
Word Count
417IN DIVORCE Evening Post, Volume CX, Issue 100, 25 October 1930, Page 14
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Evening Post. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in