CITY PARKING
(To the Editor.)
Sir,—l wish heartily to support "Traveller No. 2" in his statements regarding the lack of reason on the part of the traffic inspectors and to add that jack of courtesy can justly be charged against the majority of the inspectors. When one reecives a notice for some minor breach of the regulations and reports (as requested) at the traffic office one would think the High Commissioner was being interviewed instead of a member of the Traffic Department. Appearance at the office is waste of time: explanations are not accepted with any degree of sympathy or understanding, in fact the whole method is wrong. After interviewinpr the inspector 11 receives a summons which means anything from 30s to £5 out of pocket, and all becaut'o one was standing for 32 minutes instead of 30 minutes in po-nnd-so street, oi" ii't '.Him from a lire-plug instead of (sft, or 13 inches from the kerb instead of 12 inches or less, — 1 am, etcVICTIM.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP19300917.2.65.3
Bibliographic details
Evening Post, Volume CX, Issue 68, 17 September 1930, Page 10
Word Count
166CITY PARKING Evening Post, Volume CX, Issue 68, 17 September 1930, Page 10
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Evening Post. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in