CIVIL CASES
for plaintiff by default wae given by -Mr. T. B. M'Neil; S.M., in the JMagistrate'a Court yesterday in the fol-. lowing undefended1 civil eases:— , N. W. Cook v. B. W. M'Farlane, £2 r 383 lid; F. R. Holtoniv. Harold Bly, costs pnly, 18s; Armstrong . and Springhall, Ltd., v. It, B. Swan, £1 15a 9d; Wellington Plumbers' and Gasfittei's' Union v. iJohansson Emil Charles,' £2 14sf; William Campbell v. Gordon Hume, £10 13s; Trustees Estate E. Tempest v. H. Bates, fel 17s 6d; Kirkcaldie and Stains, Ltd., K-. A. Creagh' (separate estate), £32 3s 8d; Laery and Co., Ltd., v. Jim Kee, fe£l2 7s lid; J. T. .Yatea v. M. Powell, £2 6g 6d; Dunlop Eubber,-Co. (N.Z.); Ltd., iiv. E. H. Thomas, £7" 5s 9d; Laery and [Co., Ltd., v. Yoimg Shung, £128 14s 3d; [Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co., of N.Z., tLtd., v. H. Young,. £28 14s 3d; L. T.I Ltd., v; Radio Service, Ltd., f£3l 35.; D.1.C., Ltd./v. J. Dansey (sepFurate estate), £80 18s; J. Hall v. J. Hil], [10s; C. and A. Gdlin Timber and HardIware Co., Ltd., v. Miller Chair Co., £45 t ßs sd; W. T. Churchward v. F. R. IM'Bride, £15; Standard Bodies, Ltd., v. ; Thomasl Stewart," ££; Alexander Ross. 'Engineering Co., Ltd., v. W. Wilson, £8 3.1s 3d; N.Z. Express Co., Ltd., v. L. J. Eva-ns, £6 lls 6d; Ernest Dawson, Ltd., jj. T. Balfour-.Alnson, £2 39s 6d; Ernest iDawEon, Ltd., v. J. W. Pusscll, £11 14s; )il'ilahon Motor Supplies*, Ltd., v. Peareon and Jessup, £2 ICs fid; M'Mahon f'Motor Supplies,- Ltd.,, v. W. Patterson, |'£3 10s; Karori Drajjery and Furnishing 'Store v. Thomas STates; £1.25.6 d; N.Z.
jEailway Tradesrrien!s. s Association v. G..G. v Tuck, £2; T. H.^Oates* v. Eoy Avery, £2 ills 9d; T. H. Oites'v. W. F. Beck, £3 5s [&d; Sargood, Son, and Ewen, Ltd., v. V. £22\0sild; Sir Kenneth Douglas vv. Gordon LeVis' Keene;* £200"; M. Bryans iv. H. Dodd; £2 Is; M'Doriald and Co. H.K.Z.), Ltd., v. Mrs. It. M. Martin (separate estate), £15 Is 6d; Campbells v. iV". H. Mark, £11 11s; M. Lubranaky v. '%. M'Master, £3; M. Michelin and Co., S(td., v. Gordon Macken, £80 13s IQ<1; 'Ijankshear's, Ltd.. v. K. M'lnnes,; £1 5s fild; London Dental Institute v. G. E. feDownes, £3 12s Gd; Harry Baker v. R. D. Jfioyle, £10 10s; Butterwrorth and Co. MAust.), Ltd., v. Mason and- Waddinghara, Ee2B 17s 2d; Pethericfc and Co., Ltd., v. %T. J. Blewman, £7 15s 9d.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP19300528.2.164
Bibliographic details
Evening Post, Volume CIX, Issue 124, 28 May 1930, Page 18
Word Count
411CIVIL CASES Evening Post, Volume CIX, Issue 124, 28 May 1930, Page 18
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Evening Post. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in