Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

"NO LAXITY"

HULES OF PEOCEDUEE

An indication that he would not countenance laxity in the observance of the rules regarding discovery and other rules of procedure was given by his Honour the Chief Justice (Sir Michael Myers) during the hearing of an action for damages in the Supreme Court today.

His Honour said he had noticed that affidavits were brought before the Court time and again to the effect: "I am informed, etc." . Sometimes statements of consequence were made. There was a rule, , where a statement was made of that kind, that the source of information and ground of beliet' should be stated, and that was.a rule which to his mind must be insisted upon. There must bo no laxity with regard to the obedience of the rules to which he had referred.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP19300528.2.129

Bibliographic details

Evening Post, Volume CIX, Issue 124, 28 May 1930, Page 13

Word Count
133

"NO LAXITY" Evening Post, Volume CIX, Issue 124, 28 May 1930, Page 13

"NO LAXITY" Evening Post, Volume CIX, Issue 124, 28 May 1930, Page 13

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert