NEW ZEALAND LAW CASE
PRIVY COUNCIL RESERVES
JUDGMENT
United Press Association—By Eloctrlo TclO'
i eraph—Copyright. (Received 27th April, 112.45' p.m.)
LONDON, 26th April.
■ The Privy Council has reserved its' judgment in the New Zealand case, Burnard vl Lysnar.
• The ease originated in tho supreme Court at Gisborne. Dorothy Valentine Burnard, wife of .Leonard Thomas Burnard, solicitor, sued George Henry Lysnar and William Douglas Lysnar, M.P., < Bhcepfarmers, of Gisborne, for £3461 13s 9d, the balance said to be due upon an instrument by way of security over chattels qwned by W. D. Lysnar for goods , Supplied to_ his brother. Mr. Justico Ostler gave judgment for the plaintiff against boih defondants for the.full-amount claimed, and it was from this decision that \V. D. Lysnar appealed. The Court of Appeal held-that he had been wholly discharged from liability under the bill of sale. Mrs. Burnard appealed from this decision, andthe case was referred to the Privy Council.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP19290427.2.53
Bibliographic details
Evening Post, Volume CVII, Issue 96, 27 April 1929, Page 9
Word Count
154NEW ZEALAND LAW CASE Evening Post, Volume CVII, Issue 96, 27 April 1929, Page 9
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Evening Post. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in