Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

WET BITUMEN

BLAMED FOR MOTOR ACCIDENT

CLAIM FOB £1000 DAMAGES.

A claim for £1000 damages as the result of an,accident while in defendant's motor-car was made by Margaret Eothwell Baxter, a widow, of Wellington this morning in the Supreme Court beforo his Honour Mr. Justice Ostler and a jury of twelve against Stan ton's, Ltd., an incorporated company of Wellington, garage proprietors. Mr. P. J. O'.Began appeared for the plaintiff, and Mr. H. 1\ Johnston for the defendant.

The plaintiff, said Mr. o'Began, a widow, 63 years of ago, soiight damages as the result of motor accident injuries received in October last your. She had engaged the defendant's servant to drive her and her daughter to the Hospital from Kaiwarra. It was on the return journey, for 'which plaintiff had not engaged tho defendant, that the accident happened. Tho defendant said that no more petrol would be consumed by taking them, and invited plaintiff's son-in-law to accompany them, driving them back free. Coming from the south, tho motor-ear, when turning into Vivian street from Cambridge terrace, skidded, and collided •with a tramcar, the bitumen surface being wet. Plaintiff thereby sustained many fractured ribs, pleurisy supervened, and she became seriously and permanently disabled. Negligence was alleged on the part of Stanton in that he failed to keep a proper look-out, and did not see the tramcar, and in that he was travelling at an excessive speed. Plaintiff claimed £1000 damages and costs.

The defence admitted that plaintiff was being gratuitously conveyed by Walter Stanton, a member of the company, and admitted that the motor-car was struck by a tramear, but said that the collision was accidental and caused by the slippery state of the roads, and was not due to the defendant company's negligence, or to that of its .^servant. A further defence was that if injuries were sustained by the plaintiff they were the result of an inevitable accident.

Evidence is being taken. (Proceeding.)

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP19261207.2.118

Bibliographic details

Evening Post, Volume CXII, Issue 137, 7 December 1926, Page 11

Word Count
324

WET BITUMEN Evening Post, Volume CXII, Issue 137, 7 December 1926, Page 11

WET BITUMEN Evening Post, Volume CXII, Issue 137, 7 December 1926, Page 11

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert