"IMPUDENT FRAUD"
JUDGE'S COMMENT IN CIVIL."*" ACTION. (By Telegraph.—Press Association.) WANGANUI, This Dayi'i.;. An interesting case in which James Stuart claimed from Frank Hedgmanji . £1024 for moneys advanced froni time to time to be looked after by Hedgmany -... concluded in the Supreme Court to-day,,,, before Mr. Justice Reed. Judgm§nj-.; - was entered for the plaintiff for £§§(>"_„ 14s lid with costs. . ■ .',.'. The Judge said that he could nat .*' help remarking that it was ah impudent.* fraud. The evidence had shown thft^._j, Hedgman had acted as a sort of i^-^i viser for Stuart, and got him to send"from time to time his earnings, stat- * ing that he would look after them for%>'/; him. Stuart could not get a statement^ of how his affairs stood.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP19261119.2.125
Bibliographic details
Evening Post, Volume CXII, Issue 122, 19 November 1926, Page 10
Word Count
121"IMPUDENT FRAUD" Evening Post, Volume CXII, Issue 122, 19 November 1926, Page 10
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Evening Post. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in