Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

CHARGE DISMISSED

NO CONFIDENCE IN POLICE

EVIDENCE.

(By Teleg/aph.—Press Association.)

DUNEDIN, 21sfc August.

The unusual procedure of a Magistrate dismissing a charge of drunkenness occurred yesterday in a case where the defendant alleged that a constable assaulted him. Mr. Bartholomew, S.M., commented that five police witnesses sworo that the defendant was drunk, and an equal number of witnesses for the defence sworo that he was sober. Evidence for the defence Was given by some very reliable and reputable witnesses. Some of the police evidenco was very unsatisfactory, and he could not have the confidence in the police evidence that he should have expected.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP19260823.2.140

Bibliographic details

Evening Post, Volume CXII, Issue 46, 23 August 1926, Page 15

Word Count
103

CHARGE DISMISSED Evening Post, Volume CXII, Issue 46, 23 August 1926, Page 15

CHARGE DISMISSED Evening Post, Volume CXII, Issue 46, 23 August 1926, Page 15

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert