CIVIL CASES

Evening Post, Volume CIX, Issue 101, 2 May 1925, Page 11

CIVIL CASES

Judgment for plaintiff, by default, was given by Mr. W. G. Riddell, S.M., 'in tho following undefended civil cases on Thursday :—

A. Stark v. W. S. Mischekoski,£lo 3s 2d, costs £2 19s; Thompson Bros., Ltd., v.l*. E. Oerneke, £24. Os 4d, costs £4 Is 6d; AY; Betherington v. George Twil"ford, £8 8s lid, costs £1 16s 6d; Rad-' ford and Co. v. -lames Archibald Hamilton, £2 ss, costs £2 3s; Brooks Concrete Construction Co., Ltd.,. v. Charles R. Morris, £110 14s, costs £6 8s; Commercial Agency, Ltd., and James Johnston v. W. E. Malyon, £3 15s, costs £1 8s 6d ; The War Relief Association of Wellington v. H. E. Vercoe, £100, costs £7 2s 6d; Alice Goodall v. Jack Monkhouse, £4, costs £1 3s 6d; Hawkesßay Fisheries Co. v. J. Singleton/ £7 13s lOd, costs £2 6s 6d; Commercial Agency, Ltd., and Stiles and Matheson, Ltd., y. N. Coubray, costs only, ss; Rodgers and Hall, Ltd., v. S. Byrne, £6 12s 6d. costs £2 4s; N. K. Christio v. Walter Barnes, £2 19s. costs £1 3s 6d; Sir Kenneth Douglas v. Thomas Williamson Ward, £12, costs £2 16s; J. L. Kay and Co. v. James Pettit, £4 16s, costs £1 6s 6d; J. L. Kay and.Co. v.. W Smith, £4' 2s, costs £1 4s 6d; S..Gibson v. W. Cox, £3 16s 2d, costs £1 3s 6dj S. Bibson v. G. D. Connor, £2 16s 2d, costs £1 3s 6d; Combined Buyers, Ltd., v. Daniel Tonkins, £45 2s, costs £4 2s 6d; \V. J. Edmtihds v. C. A. Halpin, £12 ,11s, costs £2 14s; Commercial Agency, Ltd., and James Johnston, v. Walter Reid, £3 ss, costs £1 3s 6d; Commercial Agency, Ltd., and James Johnston v. H. J. Williams, costs only, ss; Commercial Agency, Ltd., and Inglis Bros., Ltd., v. J. Harsden, £2 13s lOd, costs £1 3s 6d; Commercial Agency, Ltd., and James Johnston v. James 6. Crowther, £14 Is, costs £2 14s; Commercial Agency, Ltd., and Cycle and Motor Supplies, Ltd., v. W. '-V Lees £24, costs £4 S Is '6d; Commercial Agency, Ltd., and Ross and Glendining, Ltd., v. V. Treacher, 19s 6d, costs 8s; Commercial Agency, Ltd., and W Wiggins, Ltd.,. v. L." W. Doubleday, I £10 15s 2d. costs £2 16s; Commercial Agency, Ltd., and W. Bull, Ltd., v. Kere Carter, £2 16s 6d, costs £1 3s 6d; Commercial Agency, Ltd., and E. J. Hyanis, Ltd., v. C. D. Downs and Son, £39 5s 9d, costs £4 la 6d; Thomas BalI linger and Co., Ltd., v. E. Barnaby, £4 10s, costs £1 3s 6d"; Thomas Ballinger' and Co., Ltd., v. Robert Moore. £10 , 17s 9d, costs £2 17s; Thomas Ballinger and Co., Ltd., v. G. Temple Perkins, £1 10s 6d, costs lls; Thomas Ballinser and Co., Ltd,,T. G. A. Phcar, 15s 4d, costs 9s; John Mill and Co. v. Charles Free, costs only, £1 10s. ' ■ On a judgment Summons, Daniel Hill was ordered to pay W. J. J M k sc . n £3 8s lid before 21st May, in default six days -imprisonment; Charles H. Latham to pay James Walker £15 Is at the rate ■?»-iv X. P," month ' S- Hubert to pay William Wilwh £17 3s lOd at the rate of £2 per month.