Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

TOO MANY OR TOO FEW?

EDUCATION BOARD MEMBERS.

The proposed reduction of the membership of Education. Boards, was warmly discussed by' the Wellington Education Board to-day. ,

Protests were received from :MK R. M'Callum. the Wanganui Education Board, and the Blenheim School Commit tee.. ' ■. '• ■'-• - .•■■-■ '=■: -'- .■:

Mr. T. Moss -'said-that the Wellington Board was most unfairly placed. ( The Wairarapa was inadequately represented, covering as it did. about 80 miles in each direction. Some of its roads were inpassable at this time of theyear. Personally, he had to travel 21.miles to school over bad roads, and there were schools 31 miles beyond that. The De.partment. should give the board discretionary powers to determine the representation of-each district. In the opinion of the board it would be advisable to have a more equitable representation of districts. '■

- Mr. G. T. London, acting-chairman, said that, as it was with the present representation, it was difficult for members to fulfil their duties.

Mr. Moss: "I can't do..justice to my district.-' . . ■ , ••.'■.....

Mr. London declared that they should strongly urge on the Government that the present was the "cheapest system of representation that could be commanded. The boards were the intermediaries between the Government arid the teachers for the ' control of education. It was a work that required a good deal of stimulation, and visible concern was shown by members of boards to become better acquainted with teachers in their worm. It was all to the good of-education that teachers should be shown appreciation of their work. The board should strenuously oppose any reduction of representation, and, indeed, advocate an increase of representation. :

Mr. C. I. Harkness said it-was most unfortunate that this call for reductions should come along when there was a real need; f6r increased and additional representation in some districts.

The motion was adopted unanimously: "That discretionary power be given to boards to- determine the representation for each unit of area in the education district." ■ ; -...'■. -'•■-.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP19230718.2.97

Bibliographic details

Evening Post, Volume CVI, Issue 15, 18 July 1923, Page 6

Word Count
318

TOO MANY OR TOO FEW? Evening Post, Volume CVI, Issue 15, 18 July 1923, Page 6

TOO MANY OR TOO FEW? Evening Post, Volume CVI, Issue 15, 18 July 1923, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert