Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

ARBITRATION COURT

NOMINATION QF MEMBERS

DAY FIXED BY GOVERNOR

GENERAL.

The authorities have appointed 27th January as the day for the nomination of member* and acting-members of the Court of Arbitration. Mr. W. Scott at present represents the employers on the Court, and Mr. M. J. Reardon the workers. Under the Act as amended last session, no person may De S candidate for appointment unless he has been nominated at a special meeting of an industrial union, and has signified his consent to nomination. If more than one candidate is nominated for any office the Registrar of industrial unions will forward to all unions of workers or employers, as the case- may be, a liet of the persona so nominated, and will ask each union to recommend from the list a suitable person for appointment. The most important principle involved under the amended Act relates to the matter of vo'.J.ig by the unions for the positions of assessors. Formerly, each industrial union of workers, or employers, recommended some person for appointment to the respective positions, and the Governor-General made the appointments after there had been apportioned to each person the value of the votes allowed to each union. Each union was allowed one vote, and thereafVr one vote for every fifty members. This procedure gave a heavy preponderance of voting power to large unions or organisations, such as the Amalgamated Society of Railway Servants, which, curiously enough,'though it does not work under awards of the Arbitration Court, yet has a voice in the nomination of the workers' representatives. Now, however, there is a difference in the voting system, as no individual union is allowed to exercise more than five votes. The recommendations will be confined to those persons who have been nominated, and the appointment of members of the Court will be made from those securing the highest number of votes.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP19230111.2.94

Bibliographic details

Evening Post, Volume CV, Issue 9, 11 January 1923, Page 8

Word Count
311

ARBITRATION COURT Evening Post, Volume CV, Issue 9, 11 January 1923, Page 8

ARBITRATION COURT Evening Post, Volume CV, Issue 9, 11 January 1923, Page 8

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert