Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

CRITICISM OF COURT

< AT A LABOUR BALLY.

1 " The Arbitration Court would not allow the seamen's advocate,^ Mr. W, T. Young, to put before it the financial position of the P. and 0. Co., the Union Co., and the Northern Steamship C 0.," said Mr. A. L. Monteith, at last night's Labour rally. " This means that it does not nutter whether the employers are reaping a harvest or not, the workers must get; a decraase in wages," The speaker quoted from the finding of the Royal Commission, in 1912, as indicating that the public would be charged higher rates for passages and freights if increases were granted to seamen. When an increase of £1 per month was granted, the members on the s.s. Maori benefited to the extent of £960 per annum, but higher rates brought ■in an additional £2535 per annum.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP19221120.2.105

Bibliographic details

Evening Post, Volume CIV, Issue 122, 20 November 1922, Page 8

Word Count
142

CRITICISM OF COURT Evening Post, Volume CIV, Issue 122, 20 November 1922, Page 8

CRITICISM OF COURT Evening Post, Volume CIV, Issue 122, 20 November 1922, Page 8

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert