CIVIL LITIGATION

Evening Post, Volume CII, Issue 30, 4 August 1921, Page 2

CIVIL LITIGATION

CASES FOR HEARING

QUARTERLY SESSIONS OPEN ON • MONDAY.

The quarterly civil sessions of the Wellington Supreme Court will be opened on- Monday. Eight cases are .set down for hearing by a Judge and jury alone, two will be heard before a Judge and a jury of four, and 26 will come^ before a Judge alone, making a totai of 36 cases. Details of the -cases are:— ' BEFORE A JUDGE AND A JUKY '. OF TWELVE. *

Albert Alexander Corrigan v, the New Zealand Express Co., Ltd., £1100 damages for alleged loss of luggage, etc Ihomas John Linton Buxton v. Jack Reginald 'Grey, 1 £1035 damages for alleged misrepresentation. Counterclaim, alleged expenses incurred (accounts). ,

May Gwenskde v. -John David 0 Connor, £501 damages for aliened breach of promise to marry I?? rma" Beck vj, Charles, Joseph Clark, £64b 3s 8d damages for alleged neeligence. . &

Thomas Wilham Steel v. Charles Joseph Clark, £519 10s damages for alleged negligence. kloy£s (of-London) v. the Dominion tihn Co., Ltd., ,£IOSO, repayment of moneys alleged to have been rpaid. •- The C. and A; Odlin Timber and Hardware Co., Ltd.', v. Robert Milne VVakefield and Robert Milne Wakefleld (the younger), and David Gunn Wakefield,, and William H. Wakefield, ±,053 5s 4d, for goods alleged tc have been sold. •

John MacGregor v. the New Zealand Shipping Co., Ltd., \£7so damages for alleged negligence. ':

BEFORE A JUDGE AND A JURY X OF FOUR. /-

Annie Eveline .Maude Gorman v. It-' alia Corish, £100, repayment of moneys alleged to have v _been paid and rescission of agreement. \ ■,

Alice Eva Martin v. William Farqu"har Aggers, £304 15s lOd, refund of moneys alleged to have been paid and damages for alleged breach of contract (cancellation of agreement).

BEFORE A JUDGE ALONE. The Wellington Hairy Fanners' Cooperative -Association, Ltd., v Helen Mitchell Brown, £441 17s 6d, balance Of money alleged to be owiriff for milk. Counter-claim, £471 16b 3d and accounts. Echia Scheele v. George Alfred Denning 'and Walter William Houghton 'n!n rd Parfcy)' rescission of agreement. £400, repayment of moneys paid. Harold Linney >and Sidney Edgar Pile and Alfred Carrick.v. Eva May Sample, probate in solemn form. The Behnont Quarry Co., Ltd., and others v. Thomas> Wearne and Samuel Vickery Burridge, declaration and accounts. " 'i . ' ' ■ ■ The Wellington Dairy Farmers' Cooperative Association, . Ltd., v. the Mayor, etc., of. the City of Wellington, £5038 8s sd, money alleged to be due for milk supplied. Ernest Anderson v. Burns and Sons, £155 damages for ajleged negligence. DR. Cooper v. C. W. Anderson and F. L. Howarth, £274 ss, payments alleged to be due. , : Horace' Graham Rutten v. Andrew Cochran, specific performance of agreement." ' ;'.■■, ', ' ... ' ... .'• ''/'i 1 ■ Joseph Parker and' Thomas Ramsay Cooke v. Ethel Alary Howell, £287 10s, moneys alleged to be due under agreement.''- t ' / ■'; ■" , i""^ ' . Charles Guy, Powre! and others v. Thomas Balfour^M^son, £1251 damages for alleged fraud" and cost "of goods sold. Penelope Taggart Beath V. Walter Ernest Russell and John Logan Stout, rescission' of agreement, repayment of £725. '. • . ■.'■'•'

John. Fisher v. Frank Hutchinson, "dissolution of partnership. . I ' Geoffrey Hdggard v. C. B. Lempriere and. Co., £273 Is Bd"i6r goods alleged to have been supplied. Rona Springall v. the New Zealand Express Co., £485 17s, fof goods alleged to be lost, or damages.

A. Beal'i'.ritchett, Ltd., v John Burns and Co./ Ltd., £3000 for alleged -damages,

> A. J. Wycherley, Ltd., v. William Daniell Bacon, injunction and, £500 for alleged damages. •"• ■' I-fis Majesty the King v. H. G. Anderson and Co., £153 for alleged damages. .•■'■ ,■■■■' ■' -'■-

Marion Moore "V. Alexander Moore, accounts and • administration by the Court. / • "'. ■

Henry ...'Arthur Gold and John Lawrence Arcus v. Magnus, Sanderson and Co., Ltd., possession of motor-car or value, £471 3» 6d. The Popular Picture Palace, Ltd., V. the New Zealand Picture Supplies, Ltd., £593 8s Bd, moneys alleged to be duej and accounts. . Peter Nicholas Brannigan v. Joseph Sa.ba,/£133 os 4d, moneys alleged to be due linder.agreement! . , . Leonard Carson Vaughan v. Andrew Martin. Carroll, possession; and mesne profits. ■ . ■' George Phillip and Florence Jane Corbett Phillip v. Joseph Edward Wes; terby, declaration of. valid rescission of contract and £200 deposit. John Esau Miles v. Samuel Pi'esteridge, possession and mesne profitß. Spiro. Berdeba v. Albert Bring, possession and damages for alleged trespass. . ■ Maria Cone v. Thomas Murray, possession and mesne profits. ■ '