Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

A WAGERING CASE

<2Y TBLSGr.AJH.—PKSS ASSOCIATION.) STRATFORD, Th is Day : Mr. .Bailey, S.M., delivered judgment to-day in the;wagering*case Morrison v. Sharp, in which a claim was made against Sharp as stakeholder in a bet on the Stratford election. Plaintiff alleged that the money was paid away by Sharp contrary to his instructions. At the hearing a fortnight ago, a nonsuit was applied for on tho ground that no action could lie, relying on section 70 of the Gaming Act. Concluding his judgment, j tho Magistrate said : "Tho addition of the words in our section 70 over 'and above thos contained in the English,' Act appear to me to be surplusage, and have no effect on the law as it stood before the passing of our 1894 Act. Judgment; for plaintiff, for amount claimed with costs." Security for appeal.was fixed at I £70.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP19200813.2.90

Bibliographic details

Evening Post, Volume C, Issue 38, 13 August 1920, Page 8

Word Count
142

A WAGERING CASE Evening Post, Volume C, Issue 38, 13 August 1920, Page 8

A WAGERING CASE Evening Post, Volume C, Issue 38, 13 August 1920, Page 8

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert