Untitled

Evening Post, Volume XCVII, Issue 93, 22 April 1919, Page 8

All AnsJufsa'sa is carjiftrneS. in. tJie sniiueaza- trjiHsrcfe fcys the M-fi'fcus>.K:» .isgva esaitisKisiity), aiid t-ha Jwnvs.so in the noKsfrar •■/! -.•!«;.?,Jis in Sydney t'.rajsh.-i^ises ; the necessity of deaSng viiih ii ixvji ai>. AnstraJKaii poini \/i v'jiv:. It h & matter for great regret that the efforts of tha Wow South tVsles aathyyifes i.« prevaut ■''is apraad is the dijKswra have s;»t bw-ri sijcoessfcL A large proportion of the victims si"« v»;.w:g peojie. ami ti'iare is an vopj-s'al K-cirnisixcy in sseia;.; them sndifeiy ttst off. "it h to be' iwspod that Vii-i.w«i has paasefi -thron^ii t?:e acnte :**-<tß;v; jjrf tin} At, iuiy rate pcov>se ksvp jij,{! e.-;^p«.-s"JBK.ce «v" it Imre, and it •ji»^ feu -ujiffii-; f;o J?«w E-?ath "Wales to ; hi&w t!:ai if Vkitori&iw fes.4 to uraiergo •;.{»« sasT-.e trial agsio iitey -would cot rop»al thair ex^m&aients «»«i> *khbo oe Uie " ;)reffonti'?s " ast^sires. 'Use closing of jvotels a.ftii »f pja-rtes of aiacftßSJi«nh cs.'as«s a greai -.Is?,: r>f distiress, ;;&3. t,h«re is si;:.j ti'o slvj'hlest evictee?- cf ;iny ad-".^?)-

-;-;-^re having followod &« juiflpKon »£ ihiVic- irwmvjfs,. laha Rov-i.l .SJsow in Sydney is a grsat A»st<w.'i».B event. Ti> 4.kfj-(J'in ii. is aH.cxtrftine aS&a, 'and as. a Viysasrire ior prov«3i!,ißj; iha s_c-iva<) of the discaao it wiH prove ctterly useless. l°<»pfe 3ii;si asstwaiio. and no oSiciai e-K-T.-wliisat* 'leß'.fined to discourage them ikiTO. dtscag so are vas'Jh tb« ij)convc;ni-wW.c-H thsv causo.

i JuAgjEMii Im bean given by Mr. Jusi ike Oh.apins.-D. in tJi-n SfasleHcij case. CiE. Daniell v. ifegiaal.] \V. Kebbell, j'heard at the recent- tiiiinvs of the ! Supreme Court. Tht» claim by plaintiffs j was for £73!. 10a 4d, isi connection with I tho .Ijcildiog 6? » house, less .f.350, which j ba.d besn paid by cheque.' KebbtfU h'ld. i also paid £75 in cash, in connection I with Uio carfare, making a total payment to D&niell .of ;3425. His Honour gave judgment foV the jjlaintiff for the estimated price of the building, £450, less £22, the difference between extras and dv-fects in crinsfcriicfcioii,' leaving a balance of £478. As Kebbell had paid £425, i judgment is given to plaintiffs for £3, j plus interest while the amount has been wving.- Kfts»beU has returned to him a sum of AU.3O, which had been paid into Court, and is illko allowed costs, to be Axed by the Registrar. At the hearing, Mr. Kennedy, of Wellington, appeared for plaintiff, ami Mr. H. C Robiitton lot KabbeU L