Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

OWNERS' PROFITS

MINES ALLEGED TO BE RUN AT A LOSS.

A well-known Greymouth man interested in mining ventures told a Christchurch Sun representative that the allegations by the Miners' Federation of the large profits earned by the coal-mine owners cannot bs substantiated. ■ He said: "The coal mines in this district are not a profitable investment." Detailing the history of the various mines, he points out that Paparoa cost £250,000 to develop, and he says that not only the original shareholders, but also the second and third debenture holders, lost their capital. He says that the mine has been worked for the past four years on behalf of the first debenture holders, but no interest has been paid, only expenses being earned. The North Brunner Mujing Company, floated six or- seven years ago by an Engh'sh company, lost the capital of the original shareholders, amounting to £150,000. The mine was sold to a New Zealand Company for £9000, and, he understands that it is again in the market.

The Point Elizabeth Company ako worked the "bid Brunner mine for many years at a loss. The Tynesid* Company operated twelve or thirteen years without paying a dividend. At present the mine is worked by the debenture holders. The Blackball Company pays a royalty of Is per ton to Sir Edwin Dawes, and he believed that it had not paid more than 5 per cent, for many years, despite the fact that this mine, has a great advantage through co-ordina-tion of interests with the Union Steam Ship Company, and because of the good steaming quality of the coal it commands a steady market at better prices than are obtainable by other companies. In reply to the argument that the State Mine is profitable, he says that it must be remembered that the State Mine pays no royalty, no terminal dues., and no rates and taxes, like the other companies, and has other customers in NewZealand besides the Government railways, to which the State Mine chargea what it likes.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP19180815.2.61.2

Bibliographic details

Evening Post, Volume XCVI, Issue 40, 15 August 1918, Page 7

Word Count
335

OWNERS' PROFITS Evening Post, Volume XCVI, Issue 40, 15 August 1918, Page 7

OWNERS' PROFITS Evening Post, Volume XCVI, Issue 40, 15 August 1918, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert