Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

PROHIBITED PUBLICATION

A PROSEOtmON.

This afternoon, in the Magistrate's Court, the Gordon and Gotch Proprietary, Ltd., was charged with having in possession for sale a certain prohibited publication entitled: "The International Socialist Review." Mr. L. G. Reid, S.M., was on the Bench. . Mr. P. S. K. Macassey appeared for the Crown,' and Mr. T: S. Weston for the defendant firm.

A plea of guilty was entered. - Mr. Macassey explained that the information' was laid under the War Regulations dealing with the prohibition of certain publications. The facts in the present case were that the police made a search of.defendant's premises and took possession of certain invoices. They found that during the past 18 months 114 copies of the International-Socialist Review had' been brought into :Ne\v Zealand by Gordon and Gotch. Counsel was quite prepared to accept the state-, ment that the breach was committed in ignorance. He pointed out, however, that the prohibition of this book was advertised in the newspapers. \ , Mr. Macassey added that Gordon and Gotch were very frank, and gave every assistance to the police. :

Mr. Weston pointed out that, while this panfcicular publication-. ; was ; prohibited under the Wai .Regulations, it was not prohibited under the Customs regulations. It was quite legal to import it into New Zealand, i but it was not legal to sell it or have it in one's possession. Gordon and Gotoh had submitted all their invoices to the Customs i Department,' but ■no restrictions had been placed on this particular publication. The breach had been committed entirely in ignorance, and he asked that it be treated as merely a technical offence. The Magistrate said it was not a case for a heavy penalty and fined the defendant 40s with costs.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP19170531.2.83

Bibliographic details

Evening Post, Volume XCIII, Issue 129, 31 May 1917, Page 8

Word Count
288

PROHIBITED PUBLICATION Evening Post, Volume XCIII, Issue 129, 31 May 1917, Page 8

PROHIBITED PUBLICATION Evening Post, Volume XCIII, Issue 129, 31 May 1917, Page 8

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert