Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

HOME RULE AND THE PEERS

IF AN ELECTION OCCURRED ? If, before passing the Home Rule Bill under the automatic provisions of the Parliament Act, the Liberal Government were to concede a General Election on the Home Rule issue, and if that General Election again endorsed it, would the Unionists then support the Bill? Tins question, which is being discussed at Home, presumes a large amount of generosity on the part of the Liberals. The same cannot be said of the Unionist official reply, which is reported as follows :—: — Lord Curzon, speaking for Lord Lansdowne, said that "in the event of a General Election going to indicate substantial approval of the measure, he will be prepared to advise your lordships to go into Committee to endeavour to remove the blemishes and undesirable features by which it is characterised, and to ask all parties of the House to join in the endeavour to shape, if possible, a more palatable measure." " Substantial approval," " remove the blemishes," and " more palatable measure," are all phrases that permit of a maximum of political contortion. But the Unionist reply is made to look still more peculiar by Mr. J. A. Spender, editor of the Westminster Review (Liberal), who writes : " If we went to an election this year, and won, we should under the Parliament Act get our Bill at once without asking any further advice from their lordships ; but that Lord Lansdowne shonld be ignorant of the Parliament Act is merely a symptom of the general state of mind of the peers at this moment." " General " Sir Edward Carson says in effect that the Ulster Unionists are not bothering about any popular will except their own popular will. He says : " All I can say is that we stand for the King and the Constitution, by which I mean government by the Imperial Parliament and the Imperial Executive, and I deny the right ol any Parliament or any Government before or after twenty elections to drive us out of the position to which we were born."

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP19130906.2.134

Bibliographic details

Evening Post, Volume LXXXVI, Issue 59, 6 September 1913, Page 10

Word Count
338

HOME RULE AND THE PEERS Evening Post, Volume LXXXVI, Issue 59, 6 September 1913, Page 10

HOME RULE AND THE PEERS Evening Post, Volume LXXXVI, Issue 59, 6 September 1913, Page 10

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert