HOME RULE. THE BILL FOR IRELAND
SECOND READING DEBATE NO POSSIBILITY OF RELIGIOUS PERSECUTION. By Telegraph.-Prass Association.— Copyright. • LONDON, 7th May. The debate on tho motion for the second reading of the Home Rule Bill was resumed in the House of Common* yesterday. Mr. J. H. Campbell (Unionist— Dublin University) described the conditions oforganised terrorism which, he ' declared prevailed in Clare, Galway, and Roscommon. Sir Rufus Isaacs, Attorney-General, recalled tho Tory flirtation with Federal Home Rule in the autumn of 1910, and asked tho x Opposition Leader to etate whether they approved of incitement to civil war. , Mr. Joseph Devlin (Nationalist—Belfast .West) denied that there was nny possibility of religious persecution in Ireland. DEVOLUTION. PRIME MINISTER^ REPLY TO A DEPUTATION. LONDON, 7th May. IKb Prime Minister, replying to a deputation of Scottish Liberal M.P.'s, said the Government regarded devolution as a necessary sequence of its Irish policy, and would not let the grass grow under its feet.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP19120508.2.70
Bibliographic details
Evening Post, Volume LXXXIII, Issue 109, 8 May 1912, Page 7
Word Count
157HOME RULE. THE BILL FOR IRELAND Evening Post, Volume LXXXIII, Issue 109, 8 May 1912, Page 7
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Evening Post. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in