Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

SUMNER-CHRISTCHURCH CANAL

COMMISSION REPORTS AGAINST IT. ' (Ml l*L*aSA?S— Pa*S3 ASSOCIATION.] CHRISTCHURCH, This ,pay. The report of the Hon. E. Mitohelson, Mr. W. Ferguson, and Mr. J. D. Wafaon, ihe commissioners appointed py^ the Lyttelton Harbour Board t to consider 'the commercial and financial aspects of the Sumner-ChriatJohuroh canal proposal, was presented to board to-day. 'The commission emphatically opposes the making of a oanal, and declares that Lyttelton Jim an excellent harbour, which witp im•movements in harbour and railway facilities ' can serve the purposes, qf the ■ city for fifty years. The commission contends that the canal construction would result in a heavy annual loss.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP19120124.2.49

Bibliographic details

Evening Post, Volume LXXXIII, Issue 20, 24 January 1912, Page 7

Word Count
103

SUMNER-CHRISTCHURCH CANAL Evening Post, Volume LXXXIII, Issue 20, 24 January 1912, Page 7

SUMNER-CHRISTCHURCH CANAL Evening Post, Volume LXXXIII, Issue 20, 24 January 1912, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert