Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

POLITICAL NOTES. ADDRESS-IN-REPLY DEBATE.

J A COMPLAINT. t, The actual business of the session will " $ommence to-morrow night with • th# debate. With empty Robbies there are not many indications %t interact in Parliamentary matters, |(fnd it is even now a pure matter of Speculation as to whether the debate will last two days or' two weeks. The Leader <&f theGripOsttjon will follow the mover Smd seconder, but his chance will not,' |n all probability, come until after the •Jupper adjournment. What he has to <*ay will probably depend to a very 3»rg& extent on what has gone before, ithrt the general opinion is that the larger 3ju6ject9 will not be dealt with to any * great extent until Sir Joseph Ward re- . '%urn« from England. After his return, ■$, is understood, the Opposition will Jeel more at liberty to open up discusigion on matters which require, the pre•pence of the Prjnw Minister to enable m full and searching enquiry to be made, .Oh the other hand, the Government has ■tilready made it quite clear that it has a, sufficient number of Bills ready in the Svent of the Address-in-Reply debate falling through at any moment, and it '36' quite possible that a certain amdunt of actual work will have been transacted '% Sir' Joseph Ward's return." t In this connection, however, it k iwdrthy of remark that the Opposition ia ♦iot inclined to permit Imperial affaire *&> overshadow and prevent the discusfiion of those purely local affairs which wave been so prominently before the , <|oim*fy during the recess, and on which $b' much depends during the genera), gleet-ion, -r'lt apj>e&rs, in fact, that th&y Aoiwider that the cause of Imperialism 4jfcj lost 1 rather than gained as the result «jfthe Imperial Conference, and they Ire not prepared to allow its importtStica to outweigh the importance to "♦hem of the consideration of Dominion , IffaiM. ' - Strong complaint is being made by ■ Hie Opposition as to -the leaking that |}M takea place in regard to the alteration of electoral boundaries that will 4Sefltilt from the decisions of the Repre- ■ Mentation Commissioners. In the past, ■/they state, the results were never dis'«k*ed until* the report was presented «t» Parliament through the Governor, -And they suggest that Minister* ate ftcguiring^ information,, on the subject • and using 1 it for electoral purposes. They •will probably have a , good deal, to say sibottt it when the report of* the ' Com* missiorier's comes up for discussion, in .the- Home. —— —§———■■■

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP19110731.2.86

Bibliographic details

Evening Post, Volume LXXXII, Issue 26, 31 July 1911, Page 8

Word Count
407

POLITICAL NOTES. ADDRESS-IN-REPLY DEBATE. Evening Post, Volume LXXXII, Issue 26, 31 July 1911, Page 8

POLITICAL NOTES. ADDRESS-IN-REPLY DEBATE. Evening Post, Volume LXXXII, Issue 26, 31 July 1911, Page 8

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert