PENDING LITIGATION.
SUPREME COURT FIXTURES. Mr. Justice Button sat in Chambers today and fixed the civil list as follows : Thursday, 23rd May.— Lockie v. Wellington City Council (compensation case) Friday, 24th Alay.— Gilbert Machinery (h). 'V. 'Peter Halyburton Miller and AlImrt Cock; claim £115 3s 8d for interest and goods Eupplied. Saturday, 25th May.— Charles Burdon Huston v. William Munro Whishaw; o'aini £310 Is, due on mortgage. Monday, 27th May.-— William Herbert .igate v. Stephen Alfred Judd ; claim. i! 501, damages for alleged slander. Tuesday 28th May. — John Neill Rirlcr '*. tho Royal Exchange Assurance Corporation of London ; claim on insurance policy'itnd 'for £100 damages. Wednesday. 29th May.— Thomas Lind and Joseph Michael O'Connor v. Makcrua Estate Co., Ltd.; claim £2850. breach of contract. Thursday, 30th May.— Wiiliam Corlaas Breakall v. Makerua Estate Co., Ltd. : claim £1000 commission. Friday, 31st May. — Fredeiick Richardson" V; Henry Hilmar Woltcrs and Gerald Hilmar Wolters ; claim £600 damages for destruction by fire. Saturday. Ist Jane.— David Barrie y> I Albert J. Bishop; claim £250 dumages, for alleged wrongful arrest. Tuesday and Wednesday, 4th. and 6th June. — Alexander Ferguson and Co. v. Lionel Casclbcrg; claim £10,000, for alleged breach of agreement. Thursday, 6th June. — Johnson v. Johnson and Benge; Jenfeldt v. Jonfeldt, in divorce. Friday, 7th June. — Public Trustee v. Allan Maguire ; claim £1000 damages for alleged negligence causing doatb. Monday, 10th June.— Albert Arthur Chilcote v. John Thomas Hawthorne nnd Colin Campbell Crump ; £500 damages for injuries. , Among the cases mentioned was that of Montague Edward Bannister v. the New Zealand Times Company, Ltd. ; j claim £308 for alleged wrongful dismissal. No date was fixed for hearing. Other cas«s which were called over, but for which, no fixtures were made, were the following : — William H. Barber v. Thomas K. Macdonald; claim £1425, moneys advanced. Joseph Hart v. Willhm Frederick Black; £330, for allege] breach of agreement. Stanley Crawford Castle v. Arthur Seldon Pike; spr«ilic performance and damages. . Helena 80phia James v. William Kinross White and Fred. Arnold Baker; claim £20, an.l further sums deducted from annuity. Michael Bee Domuth v. St. George A. Dowsing; £400. for alleged slander and libel. John Gwynnetu Stcvena nnd Frederick John Jones v. Charles Hayward Izard; claim £864 5s 6d or £641 12s commission. Arthur Charles Fout and William Richard Parker apd, Thomas Parker v. John Judd; specific iiflrfth-m* ance. Thomas Rogers v. Clyidtw^ H Bond and John T. Hopkia»JiiJ^fetl-m and £500 dainagC3 for all?!??* iTlirin^ement of patent. Margaret Oldfenld Spence v. Albert Clarence EtiidH j specific performance, or £500 dttftickgefe for alleged breach of contract. Wilison, Thompson, and Co., Ltd., and Novman Howard Maxwell Dalaton v. John Pottle , claim £548 8s 4d and interest on moneyspaid. William Edwin Rcdoton* nnd William CampboJl v. Frederick Hmiry Pitcher; clulm £479 5s s<l, alluged to be duo on agreement. Tbe cose of Peter Baxter Ross v. Arthur David Ulic'c lms been settled. It was a claim for apji-ific performance and £76 for breach ut centract. Sittings in 'divorce are to bo held on Monday, Tueuday, and Wednesday noxt. Tho list of coses is as follows: — Emma Matilda. Coatcs v. JilianHamea Coatcs; Florence Hawthorne v, Francis George Hawthorne; James Johnson v. Sarah Johnson and Edward Bongo ; Annie Sarah Jonfeldt v. William Jacob John Julias Jenfeldt; Robert Nicol v. Sarah Eliza Jono Nicol; Sarah Maria White v. John White; Elizabeth Evans v. Ralph John Evans; Charlotte Isabella Wilhelmina ihramore Graham v. Walter Robert Graham; Charlotte Matilda O'Kelley v. John Henry O'Kelley ; Mary Mabel Campbell v. Samuel Campbell; Richard Laerv Pope v, Laila Askin Pope; Elizabeth Vine v. George Vine; John .M'llwham v. Amy MTlwham and William Falls ; Catherino Amolia Frances Scot-land-Smith v. John Scotland-Smith j Kato Ruby Lo«h v. Fredk. William Lauh; Charles Chriutopher Machell Watson Manro v. Emily Florence Munro and Oorald Bourkc; Herbert Palmer Uenton v. Jessie Henton; Frances Mary Thomnu v. Joseph Thomas; Walter Samuel Best v. TTolen Lncrctia. Beat; Augustus Henry 8.-nggnrley v. Lily Winifred Bnggarloy and Thomas H. Phillips; Annie Rons v. Ocorio Ros»i All tho petitions are for dissolution of marriage. ■'
Mr. W. Hull, diroot importer, Newtown, inierti a disclaimer in tlii* issue.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP19070517.2.60
Bibliographic details
Evening Post, Volume LXXIII, Issue 116, 17 May 1907, Page 6
Word Count
685PENDING LITIGATION. Evening Post, Volume LXXIII, Issue 116, 17 May 1907, Page 6
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Evening Post. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in