SUPREME COURT CIVIL SITTINGS.
The following is the list of oases set down for hearing at the oivil sittings of the Supreme Court, which commenoe after the criminal calendar has been disposed of : — SPECIAL JURr OP 12. Harrington v. Wellington Harbour Board (Mr. Poynton for plaintiff, Mr. Gully for defendant), claim of .£5lO, damages for injuries received. Bell and others v. Finn and another (Mr. Young for plaintiffs, Mr. Devine for de. fendants), olaim of professional charges. COMMON JTJBY OF 12. M'Lean v. Noonan (Mr. Wilford for plaintiff), claim of £525, compensation for slander. Caroline M'Govern v. W. C. Watson (Mr Baldwin for plaintiff, Mr. Gully for defendant), olaim of .£5Ol , damages for trespass. Enigge v. Knigge (Mr. Jellicoe for plaintiff. Mr. Hislop for defendant), olaim ol £780, dissolution of partnership.^ Collier v. Melrose Borough Council (Mr Wilford for plaintiff, Mr. Skerrett for defendant), olaim of £525, damages. Gilohrist v. Brown, Thomson & Co. (Mr. Wilford for plaintiff, Mr. Skerrett for defendant), olaim of £525, damages for wrongful dismissal. Kebbell v. Jillett (Mr. Quick for plaintiff, Mr. Brown for defendant), claim of £550, damage caused by fire. COMMQN JDBT OP yOTJB. Patterson v. Hyde & Bidd iSir Robert Stont for plaintiff, Mr. Edwards for defendants), olaim of £250, damage by firs. Drinkwater v. U.S.S. Company (Sir Robert Stont for plaintiff), claim for £250 damages. WITHOUT A. JUBT. London v. Morrison (Mr. Skerrett for plaintiff), claim for possession of land. M'Laren v. Morrison and another (Mr Menteath for plaintiff), dissolution of partnership. Tanner v. Wooler and another (Mr Skerrett for plaintiff, Mr Hislop for defendants), olaim of £400, breaoh of contract. Burke and another v. Burke and others (Mr Skerrett for plaintiffs, Mr. Devine fodefendants!, claim for letters of administra tion under will. Egan v. Dealy and another (Mr. Edwardifor plaintiff, Mr. Treadwell for defendants) claim for delivery of a document. Garratt v. Smith and another (Mr. Devine for plaintiff, Mr. Treadwell for defendants), cancellation of title, &a. Wellington - Manawatu Railway Co. v Johnston and another (Mr. Travers fo plaintiff, Mr. Skerrett for defendant), claim of £104, instalments due. Brenohley v. Blinkhorne (Sir Robt. Stout forpltintiff), specifio performance. Wardell Bros. v. Maokay (Mr. Morrison for plaintiffs), claim of £451 damages. Bell v. Bell (Mr. Gully for plaintiff), claim I for money lent. j Jones v. Gray (Mr. Skerrett for plaintiff, I Mr. Brandon for defendant), claim of £200 damages. Ft George v. Aked (Pir Robert Stont for plaintiff, Mr. Jellicoe for defendant), claim of £100 damages. New Zealand Loan and Mercantile Co. v Drummond (Mr. Treadwell for plaintiff), olaim of £350, security over sheep. Cattell v. Barber (Mr. Edwards for plaintiff), claim of £600 for rent. Spurway v. Lambert and another (Mr. Treadwell for plaintiff, Mr. Chapman for defendants), olaim of £469 12s 6d on certificate, as to completion of contract. DIVOBCI. Morris v. Morris, wife's petition (Mr. Skerrett for petitioner).
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP18950601.2.47
Bibliographic details
Evening Post, Issue 128, 1 June 1895, Page 4
Word Count
478SUPREME COURT CIVIL SITTINGS. Evening Post, Issue 128, 1 June 1895, Page 4
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.