A Singular Action. FATHER AGAINST DAUGHTER.
|Bt Telegraph. J [united press association.] Chkibtchurch, This Day. Mr. Justice DennUton yesterday Rare judgment for defendant, without ooati, in Taylor v. Taverner, a Timaru case. The defendant is plaintiff's married daughter, and before her marriage she transferred to her father her interest in a deferred payment section at Orari. She had not carried out her obligations as selector, bnt plaintiff paid the pnrchaee money, and occupied the land. On the expiration of the term defendant obtained a certificate of title. Plaintiff now sought to compel defendant to execute a memorandum of transfer to him. The Judge held that defendant had not fulfilled her obligations as a selector or obtained the consent of toe Land Board to t>;c a jsigiiUiMit of her interest in the land. The ajsitfement v/as not vaiid, as ehe had Fct up the unsuccessful plea thai the transfer was obtained from her by fraud, and had allowed plaintiff to expend money on the land intending to obtain the benefit of it herself.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP18900711.2.26
Bibliographic details
Evening Post, Volume XL, Issue 10, 11 July 1890, Page 2
Word Count
172A Singular Action. FATHER AGAINST DAUGHTER. Evening Post, Volume XL, Issue 10, 11 July 1890, Page 2
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in