Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

AN EXTRAORDINARY DIVORCE CASE. [UNITED PRESS ASSOCIATION.] Auckland, lBth November.

In the divorce case, Hedley v. Hedley and Anderson, co-respondent, to be heard at Wellington on the 26th, the evidence of Auckland witnesses in the case will be taken at the Supreme Court here, to prevent tho necessity for their going to Wellington. The following details have transpired : — About eighteen months ago Hedley, his wife and family, and Anderson, proprietor of the Metropolitan Hotel, arrived here from England together, where they had been intimately acquainted. Mr. and Mrs. Hedley had been ten years married, and had five children. After the purchase of the Metropolitan Hotel by Anderson, Hedley's family went to reside there, and Mrs. Hedley acted as his housekeeper. Anderson went to the Hot Springs, but a letter found in a drawer at the hotel, and other circumstances, led Hedley to remove his family to ParnelL Seeing Anderson subsequently in the vicinity of his new residence, Medley left with his wife and family for Christchurch, and there, from interviews with his wife, Hedley became convinced that matters were not satisfactory, and she suddenly left for Auckland, taking her children with her. It is alleged Anderson supplied her with the passage money. Hedley arrived here on the 9th, and being unable to obtain an interview with his wife disguised him3elf and penetrated into the hotel. He was, however, recognised by the barman, a fellow passenger from England, whom it is said he threatened with a revolver if he did not disclose the whereabouts of Anderson and Mra. Hedley. During the altercation Mrs. Hedley, hearing the noise, got away by another door with her children ; and Anderson, notwithstanding Hedley's careful s arch, got clean away also. Hedley invoked the aid of the police, who sent a message to Anderson to disclose the whereabouts of Mrs. Hedley and her children. Anderson replied declaring hi 3 ignorance, and Kedl9y then asked that Anderson and Mra. Hedley should come to the police station for an interview in the presence of the police, but the request was declined. Hedley, finding his efforts useless, left in the Eotoraa for Chriatchurch. Two hours after the steamer left, the missing lady, who could not be found, was seen in Queen-street in company with Anderson.

Why are women archers by nature ?—Because the bent of their inclinations is to bend a beau.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP18801119.2.18

Bibliographic details

Evening Post, Volume XX, Issue 271, 19 November 1880, Page 2

Word Count
393

AN EXTRAORDINARY DIVORCE CASE. [UNITED PRESS ASSOCIATION.] Auckland,lBth November. Evening Post, Volume XX, Issue 271, 19 November 1880, Page 2

AN EXTRAORDINARY DIVORCE CASE. [UNITED PRESS ASSOCIATION.] Auckland,lBth November. Evening Post, Volume XX, Issue 271, 19 November 1880, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert