Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

"MUTE OF MALICE."

Whether, a silent prisoner was "'mute of malice or by visitation of God," was the question that a jury had to answer before a trial could proceed at West Sussex sessions. Alfred Bernarc. Ayres, motor mechanic, was charged with breaking- iuto a territorial drill hall at Worthing and stealing- money and cigarettes, but he refused to plead.

Dr. Watson, senior medical officer at Brixton Prison, stated that Ayres spoke normally while in prison awaiting trial until four days before his appearance in Court. After receiving a letter which appeared to upset him, he ceased speaking. It was the doctor's opinion that prisoner was capable of speaking. The jury found that Ayres was mute of malice, and, after evidence had been given, he was sentenced to IS months' hard labour.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EG19270408.2.23

Bibliographic details

Ellesmere Guardian, Volume XLV, Issue 3078, 8 April 1927, Page 6

Word Count
132

"MUTE OF MALICE." Ellesmere Guardian, Volume XLV, Issue 3078, 8 April 1927, Page 6

"MUTE OF MALICE." Ellesmere Guardian, Volume XLV, Issue 3078, 8 April 1927, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert