BIRTH CONTROL.

Dunstan Times, Issue 3113, 17 April 1922, Page 2

BIRTH CONTROL.

Lord Dawson’s speech on Sexual Relationships, delivered at the Church Congress held in Birmingham last autumn has just been repubUshed in pamphlet form under the title of “Love—Marriage—-Birth Control,’ and in a foreword the author replies briefly to the criticisms which his address provoked. The first part of the speech was devoted to urging, as a safeguard against evil, the study of the significance and purport of sex love in a well-ordered and Christian comm mity and provision for its healthy outlet, and the view he then upheld has. Lord Dawson says, brought forth a large measure of agreement and no reasoned disagreement; but the second part, which dealt with birth control, “or what in strict accuracy should be called conception control,” has aroused much controversy.

“I venture to think,” says Lord Dawson, “that* some at least of the criticism directed against my argument will disappear with a perusal of this full text of my speech. Therein will be found condemnation of infertile marriages, and a strong plea that children are essential to the health and happiness of men and women, are necessary to each other, and of vital importance to the nation.

“The difference between my critics and myself is not as to the vital necessity of tho family following marriage, but rather this they would like to see the large families prevalent lilty years ago restored (and, where means and circumstances are favourable, such large families may be the source of much happiness); whereas under present-day conditions I should regard them as seldom attainable and desirable, and would favour smaller families of children born at predetermined intervals.

“A married couple who have produced lour children in twenty years cannot be said to have ignored the precept, ‘Be fruitful and multiply and replenish the earth’ because they have so selected the times for the conceptions of their children as to enable them to give these children a better upbringing rather than have selfishly left the sequence of their offspring to blind chance. “Tiie argument that the nation should foster large families in order more quickly to people the untenanted portions of the Empire, and so add to the strength and wealth of the British Dominions, requires serious attention, not in isolation but in conjunction with other considerations, and calls forth varying opinions from economists. On the other hand, emigration into foreign lands would seem to be a source of weakness to a nation.

“hrom another standpoint the criticism is made that I have not urged the paramount necessity of diminishing the population of these islands. With the economic soundness of this view others are better fitted to deal, but no economic considerations would outweigh the importance of child life inspiring the homes of the land, and if the number and sequence of children can be regulated by the parents’ circumstances these homes will increase in number, will start when parents are younger, and confer greater benefits alike on the family and the State. If need be, the State could grant a progressive rebate of taxation and educational facilities for each of three children born after the second and where the father is 25 years of ago oi 1 upwards. ‘‘lt is held by some that artificial birth control is contrary to Christian morals. This is the view firmly held by the. Roman Catholic Church, and since the governance of the Roman Communion is based on ‘authority,’ its decisions are binding on its members and command our respect. But pronouncements of Protestant Communions do not owe their force to ‘authority,’ but to the conviction they carry in the minds and consciences of their people, and no clear scriptural sanction for the condemnation of birth control has been given, nor does the report of the Lambeth Conference vouchsafe any reason why it is physically and morally harmful. “A distinguished prelate of our church has characterised the views herein set forth as ‘very unguarded.’ If by that expression (at the Diocesan Conference at York) he means ‘careless,’ he. cannot have done me the honour of reading my speech, which, whatever its demerits, bears ample evidence of carefully considered thought and expression. If by ‘unguarded’ he means ‘outspoken,’ I will plead justification. For is it not time that a question which deeply concerns not only the thought, but the practice of the thinking portions of communities should be fully considered and its strength and its weakness disclosed by full discussion?

“The fear that discussion of this vital problem will endanger morality _ surely loses sight of the fact of knowledge being so fundamental to our well-being that incidental dangers encountered along its path must not deter us from its continued pursuit. Moreover, it will be noticed that I have discriminated between the principle of birth control and the methods of its application, the latter being preferably determined by the advice of the family doctor rather than by the perusal of books in general circulation. The attitude of mind of the church towards the problems of sexual relationships is part of a larger question, namely, the ever-widening gap between the formal teaching of the church and the actual belief of the present generations, including many who by baptism and early training belong to her fold. This gap between authority and actuality of belief imposes a strain on intellectual integrity, and weakens the foundations of a real allegiance. For those of us who are of mature years the gap is bridged by the tender associations of our childhood and the memory of parents for whom no such gap existed, and whose faith and character have left indelible impressions on our lives. But for the youth of to-day no such bridge exists. The war has caused a hiatus, and though has broken with tradition. Thus, youth is no longer willing to accept forms and formulae only on account of their age. So it has set out on a. voyage of inquiry, and finding some things which are doubtful and others which are insufficient, is searching for forms of expression more in harmony

with the realities of life and knowledge. Although becoming estranged in thought from the church, it is possessed of deep religious feeling, and, firm on the rock foundation of faith, is trying to build a superstructure more in accord with the -■/ progress of revelation, not only in religion, but in science, and the needs of the world in which it moves and has its being.”