Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image

liabilities being, of oourse, the chief. It could never have been anticipated that the ratepayers of a borough should be saddled with a larger rate than was necessary, simply because the orders of the Controller had been disobeyed, or not yet complied with." Then again, the AuditorGeneral declined to accept the balance-sheet because it contained no sinking fund account. The explanation to that is that " the sinking fund account for the year ended March 31st, ISiJO, being iv precisely the same position as it stood in 1889, was left out of the present bal'iuco-sheet by a distinct order to that cf? ct from the Auditor-General's Department." There hiis been no roply to this letter, but tho biilance-shuets have been returned uncertified to. It remains for the AnditorGeneral to take what action he pleasas.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DTN18900813.2.7

Bibliographic details

Daily Telegraph (Napier), Issue 5908, 13 August 1890, Page 2

Word Count
133

Untitled Daily Telegraph (Napier), Issue 5908, 13 August 1890, Page 2

Untitled Daily Telegraph (Napier), Issue 5908, 13 August 1890, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert