ACTION AGAINST A LONDON GAS COMPANY.
The following is an account of an aeSon auams,t <i London (t.h Oompjny for cutting oil a consiunei'i g.is, which shows tli-U Gas Companies it homo have no siu dl responsibilities :—Tiu Sjcrcfciry ot tho Fluenix tr.is Company was suin-no >ed by Kdwaul Ihlliei, of 2, Bla-kfriars Iliad, 10-frcslnuuDt-hou3o keeper, fai uaUwtuily refusing to bupply him with gai wheieby a penalty had boon incurred of 40<. pjrdiy. Ifc dppu.iro'l complainant had boou a, entomoi of the company for 17 yeirs pas»t, .mil hid at first piil til in % deposit, wnich, however, they had returned him wt'i mtcieat several year3 ago. He regu'aily pml his gai up to Cbristmaa, 1S73, without a dispute, but after tbeu he applied to the company for » d>y niiil"r, wluoli they supplied, and he paid the OiiriHtuias quarter'^ {£*>& 1Sa <Jd - He aftor , wai &* received a bill for the quarter from (Jlnistmas to Lady Day, amounting to £12 18a 9d, whioh ha paid upou the iijth June last, without dispute. Ho subsequently had au au application for £10 19i 9 1, for ga<j a'leged to have becu supplied butw -en Lady Day and June, and in ismiich as duiiny the period he had beou a consumer, hi3 «as for such a quarter had never exceeded £5, ho felt there must bo some mistake, and had the meter tested by the Government Inspector, who condemned it, and if; was taken away by defendants, and a now one supplied on ill 5 liith July Ho made an application to soe th j boanl, and afterwards received anotico that if he did not pay £10 10s lid.— the compiny ouly agnoing to m«ko him an allowance of 0s. for the excessive charge — his vas would br cut off. He afterwards applied to the magistrate, and then t'io defendants off'ied to make him an allowance of £4 10-<., which he lefused, and aubseqncntly they offoied an allowanoo of £6 4s., which ho a«tced to accept. Hn reouivod an ajcouut then showing £4 h"s. 9 I. at dun from him. On the 12. h September the collector called and leit a notice that tho p.is would be cut ulF unless he paid £4 15a. 9ii. in thren days, uhioli he refused to pay, and on ttie 17th hist, tho gis was cut oil'. Mr. Bumon.tvfter heaiiu^t'io witnehSi s for the defence, one of whom said thore had been an picupo iifts.owinflf to the bidnes 1 ? of tho littinys siid he could lnr.Uy think th.it, and then tho o unpany to allow £(> 4s. He cousidrrod tli'i company hud acted in an impropi r mauiicr, and s>ueh proceedings could not b 1 allowed. Ib h.id deprived complainant of his y<i3 for a clear day, aucl ho therefore, mdiofced a ponalty of
, ,. ''iokn , » ho "itj4Uh,- mid -Alia O'-Hfsf, Mr «- . -i-ith^ \>i,n-i't.\ iot the pl.-.intitf, Hi>'r»CJt«u. company should iMrrn rhaoelv gas, and Mr. Benson Bald it re waafiot done, the samo penalty would bs inflicted for eacL 'lay.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DSC18741228.2.24.8
Bibliographic details
Daily Southern Cross, Volume XXX, Issue 5412, 28 December 1874, Page 3
Word Count
498ACTION AGAINST A LONDON GAS COMPANY. Daily Southern Cross, Volume XXX, Issue 5412, 28 December 1874, Page 3
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.