Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

POLICE COURT. -Thursday. [Before A. Beetham,Esq., and R. F. Porter, Esq., J.P.s.]

Drunkenness. — Margaret Conway, John Mtzsymonds, and John Martin were dealt with for drunkenness.

DRTOfKANDDisoBDERLY. — JbsephOgmond, for having been disorderly as well as drunk,

was ordereu cv pay £ l, or De imprisoned 48 hours, with hard labour.

Breach of the Mttnicipali Police Act, 1866. — W. J. Messenger, charged with a breach, of the Municipal Police Act (15th sub-section of section 5) by having a ahelf along the front of his shop, which projected over the footpath, pleaded guilty, and was ordered to pay the mitigated fine of £1 and costs, the full penalty provided by the clause cited being £10,

Breach of th£ Impounding Act, 1867. —James Linsey pleaded gfcilty to a breach of this Act, by fastening a horse in Victoriastreet East, offßarrackhill, on Sunday last, —fined 20s. and costs.

Breach op the Dangerous Goods' 1 Act, 1809. — Joseph Eeilly (Inspector of W eights and Measures) charged Mr. Samuel BroV'a with a breach of the 6th clause of the" Dangerous Goods Act, 1869, by having stored, in a house off Chancery-lane, 24 tins of kerosine, on the 13th June, contrary to the provisions of the Act.— Mr. Brown pleaded guilty, stating that he was not awaie of the provisions of the Act.— Mr. Wynu, who appeared for the prosecution, said, as Mr. Brown had pleaded ignorance of the provisions, arid this being the first case, the authorities weie quite willing that merely a nominal fine should be imposed, in order that the public might be aware of the intention on the part of the authorities to take active steDS in the matter.— The Bench imposed a nominal fine of £1 and costs, and added that the Act compelled them to order that the kerosine should be forfeited. This concluded the business.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DSC18700617.2.30.2

Bibliographic details

Daily Southern Cross, Volume XXVI, Issue 4000, 17 June 1870, Page 4

Word Count
303

POLICE COURT. -Thursday. [Before A. Beetham,Esq., and R. F. Porter, Esq., J.P.s.] Daily Southern Cross, Volume XXVI, Issue 4000, 17 June 1870, Page 4

POLICE COURT. -Thursday. [Before A. Beetham,Esq., and R. F. Porter, Esq., J.P.s.] Daily Southern Cross, Volume XXVI, Issue 4000, 17 June 1870, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert