Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

WORKERS’ CASE FAILS

(By Telegraph—Press Association.) DUNEDIN, August 22.

In the Magistrates’ Court, Mr. Bartholomew, S.M., gave judgment for defendant company in a test case in which Ross and Glendining, woollen mill owners, were proceeded against by employees for extra payment for 19 shifts at 3/- a shift, as adult workers by virtue of the labour legislation suspension order. The magistrate gave leave to appeal in view of the important principle involved. He said plaintiffs’ contention that ordinary workers on day shift were equally entitled with night shift workers to extra pay was invalid. The difference between shift work and ordinary work was recognized by clause 4 of the suspension order. Plaintiffs’ position had not been in any way affected by the working of a night shift.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19400823.2.101

Bibliographic details

Dominion, Volume 33, Issue 282, 23 August 1940, Page 11

Word Count
127

WORKERS’ CASE FAILS Dominion, Volume 33, Issue 282, 23 August 1940, Page 11

WORKERS’ CASE FAILS Dominion, Volume 33, Issue 282, 23 August 1940, Page 11

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert