Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

LOW BEEF PRICES

Contrast With Australian

V alues WHAT IS THE REASON? (By H-A.S.) During one week at the Australian fat stock centre of Newmarket, near Melbourne, over 4000 head of cattle were sold. These realized from 34/6 to 40/6 a 1001 b. of dressed carcase weight. The New Zealand export schedule for the best beef we grow is 32/0. i.e.. 2/- below the lowest return at a typical Australian centre and at a saie where the report clearly states “Exporters operated actively.' Under the New Zealand ••commandeer” wool is bettered by 30 per cent, upon last season’s prices, lamb by 13 per cent., wether mutton by 15 per cent, and ewe mutton by 50 per cent. Yet beef is a full 10 per cent, worse Cinderella of our fat stock. As compared with Australia, our beef is all as good, and Britain is paying a fair price for it. Though Britain is paying as much for New Zealand beef as for Australian beef it will be seen that the farmer is receiving considerably less in New Zealand than he is in Australia. It is strange that this matter has not been taken up by the Meat Board, for the encouragement of cattle raising is a vital thing as far as hill country is concerned. It will be a great blunder if the disparity in price between mutton and beef leads to the accentuation of the worst feature ot North Island farming—overstocking with sheep.

Nor only are New Zealand producers getting less than their Australian competitors bur. they are ’olll’ mi past seasons’ prices, unlike any of our other primary producers. The very 32/6 of th- current schedule is fictitious; in the sense that this is an at-port-works one. It really represents about 31/- to the farmer, compared with 35/- and 34/- received for chillers in the last two seasons. That New Zealand exporters can pay only 32/6 a 1001 b. for our best beef, whilst in Australia 34/6 is paid, on the same basis, for beef, no better, if as good. ■ indicates that something is seriously out of adjustment. As both the British Government's “commandeer" price for beef and out own freezing charges appear in order, ir would seem that rhe trouble must lie with the return by-products. The situation is one demanding urgent, temedial action. The beef-killing season reaches its height during the coming three months.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19400127.2.115

Bibliographic details

Dominion, Volume 33, Issue 105, 27 January 1940, Page 16

Word Count
398

LOW BEEF PRICES Dominion, Volume 33, Issue 105, 27 January 1940, Page 16

LOW BEEF PRICES Dominion, Volume 33, Issue 105, 27 January 1940, Page 16

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert