ARCHITECTS CHOSEN
Subsidiary Hospital In Christchurch By Telegraph—Press Association. CHRISTCHURCH, April 16. A competition held to decide which architects should prepare the plans for the new subsidiary hospital at Cashmere was decided yesterday, the jury announcing that the winning design had been submitted by Messrs. Gummer and Ford, of Auckland. The second choice was a design by Messrs. Massey Morgan and Bateson, Auckland, and a Christchurch firm, Messrs. Helmore, Cotterill and Harman, was third. For more than two weeks the jury (Sir Hugh Aeland, Mr. P. Rule, architect, Tiniaru, and Mr. L. B. Evans, chairman of* the North Canterbury Hospital Board), had given the designs careful consideration. In a brief statement Mr. Evans said that the winning design would not necessarily be adopted as it stood. The competitors had agreed to make any alterations desired by the board. Mr. Evans said that the jury’s report would be submitted to a meeting of the board on Wednesday week. Full details would then be available. The undertaking for which Messrs. Gummer and Ford are now architects is a subsidiary hospital to be built on seventeen acres of land recently acquired by the board at the foot of cashmere Hills. The new hospital is to relieve the pressure on the present public hos'pital. A start with the erection of the new building will be made as soon as possible. When the board decided on the establishment of the subsidiary block the figure of £200,000 was mentioned, and this is an indication of what the contract price might be.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19390418.2.122
Bibliographic details
Dominion, Volume 32, Issue 172, 18 April 1939, Page 10
Word Count
255ARCHITECTS CHOSEN Dominion, Volume 32, Issue 172, 18 April 1939, Page 10
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Dominion. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.