JURY FAILS TO REACH DECISION
Negligent Driving Charge IMPORTANT QUESTION INVOLVED By Telegraph—Press Association. Christchurch, July 29. The trial of Frank Rowland Coe on a charge of negligent driving so as to cause death, was described by Air. Justice Northcroft in the Supreme Court to-day as a “classic” one as the jury’s decision would set a standard of reasonable care for motorists. His Honour said that the Crown’s case was that the accused was travelling at a reasonable speed and was not affected by liquor, but the question was whether the accused was reasonably careful in continuing when blinded by tiie lights of another vehicle. During that time lie fatally injured a cyclist. The accident no doubt happened through someone taking risks. The question was whether the accused took the risk. A man was forbidden to take any risk which endangered anyone else. A person who drove when he could not see was guilty of negligence. The accused was on the horns of a dilemma. Either he did not keep a proper look-out or else he was trying to do so but could not by being blinded by oncoming lights. The accused’s action in pulling over to the left and slowing down for a considerable distance before the bicycle was struck indicated that he had been embarrassed by the lights for some time. Pulling to the left under such circumstances did not seem to be wise as anything might be struck. It was unfortunate that the cyclist had pulleij over to the gravel in the hope that there at least he would be safe. It would be a great misfortune if the jury, thinking this man did not use reasonable care, failed to say so. The jury retired at 12.10 p.m. and at 4.10 returned without a verdict. “That is quite definite,” the foreman of the jury said when he informed the court that no decision had been reached. “I appreciate the effort you have made to come to a decision on an important matter,” his Honour said. A new trial was then ordered, but no definite date was fixed. Bail was allowed as before.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19370730.2.125
Bibliographic details
Dominion, Volume 30, Issue 260, 30 July 1937, Page 12
Word Count
355JURY FAILS TO REACH DECISION Dominion, Volume 30, Issue 260, 30 July 1937, Page 12
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Dominion. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.