LEGAL PARADOX
Magistrates’ Conflicting Decisions Opposed TRANSPORT REGULATIONS Challenging the validity of the Transport Goods Order, 1933-34, legal argument was heard ■in Wellington yesterday before the Court of Appeal, which will decide whether or not the licensing rule for goods transport services need be observed. The hearing will' be continued to-day. Tfie appeal' is of a dual nature and has a curious aspect in that in one instance the appellant is a carrier who was convicted for not having a license, and. in the other instance it is the Inspector of transport who is appealing because the magistrate’s decision in another part of New Zealand went against him and in favour of the carrier concerned in that case. The two appeals have been removed from the Supreme Court to'the Court of Appeal to be heard consecutively.
The carrier who is appealing against the Magistrate’s Court conviction for not being licensed under the Transport Licensing Act, 1931,'.is A. F. Wilson, of Wanganui, aud the respondent is E. H. Barrett, the traffic Inspector who brought the information. The inspector who conversely is acting as appellant in the second case is M. O. Fairhurst, who in the Dunedin Magistrate’s Court had been the informant In the charge heard unsuccessfully against Robins aud Co., carriers. For tlie carrier appellant it was stated that the effect of the regulations being declared ultra vires would mean that the whole of the licenses would cease to apply. It would not ho an offence to carry on a service without a license as those existing would be valueless. A new Order-ln-Council would be ’necessary. On the Bench were the Chief Justice (Sir Michael Myers). Mr. Justice Herdman, Mr. Justice Blair. Mr. Justice Smith and Mr. Justice Kennedy. Mr. p. L. Dickson (Wanganui) appears for Wilson and the Crown solicitor (Mr. A. E. Curry), with him the Crown solicitor at Wanganui (Mr. N. R, Bain), for Barrett. Messrs. .Curry and Bain appear also for Falrhurst and Mr. G. T. Baylee (Dunedin) represents Robins and Co.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19350626.2.57
Bibliographic details
Dominion, Volume 28, Issue 230, 26 June 1935, Page 8
Word Count
336LEGAL PARADOX Dominion, Volume 28, Issue 230, 26 June 1935, Page 8
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Dominion. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.