Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

“NOT SATISFACTORY”

Concessions in India Bill

Y.W.C.A. SECRETARY’S VIEWS

By Telegraph.—Press Association.

Hamilton, June 10.

Describing the concessions as most unsatisfactory to advanced Indian thought, Miss Jean Begg, national secretary of the Y.W.C.A,. in India, strongly criticised what she considered the hesitating steps toward self-govern-ment taken in the new India BUI when she addressed members of the Hamilton Rotary Club to-day. She . considered the tragic Indian situation could have been averted had political freedom in some measure been granted 15 years ago.

Miss Begg said the concessions in the India Bill were hedged about with considerable safeguards to meet possible emergencies. The Bill looked characteristicaUy British, and sought an easy middle path, but it fell far shor of what was desired by advanced political thought in India itself, although in England the conservative standpoint considered it as h rash experiment. It had to be acknowledged, however, that the provisions of the Bill were far in advance of what had been set down in the old Constitution, but many would have preferred the scheme to have, gone farther toward self-government Behind the strong criticism, even denunciation, that existed in India at the terms suggested there was (i feeling of bitter disappointment, for it was hoped that the new proposals might have been of the greatest help in cementing relationships between Britain and Ind.a. There was obviously no prospect of Dominion status for India, and this had hurt its countrymen more than a layman could tell.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19350611.2.67

Bibliographic details

Dominion, Volume 28, Issue 217, 11 June 1935, Page 8

Word Count
244

“NOT SATISFACTORY” Dominion, Volume 28, Issue 217, 11 June 1935, Page 8

“NOT SATISFACTORY” Dominion, Volume 28, Issue 217, 11 June 1935, Page 8

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert