Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

NO COMMITMENTS

Tafks Will Not Affect Freedom of Action GERMANY AND COLONIES (British Official Wireless.) Rugby, April 9. Following Sir John Simon’s statement in the House of Commons on the Minister’s European tour, the Leader of the Opposition. Mr. G Lansbury, remarked that he was expressing the view of a very considerable body of opinion when he said that it was hoped that the Government was going to carry out a policy at Stresa of collective security through the League of Nations, based not merely on piling up poison gas or armaments but on disarmament. Answering various supplementary questions. Sir John Simon gave an assurance that, as in the case of the previous conference, no definite commitment would be entered into without previous discussion in Parliament. The Government’s freedom of action, he said, would not be affected in any way by what passed at Stresa. That conference would be followed clOoely by a special meeting of the League Council, but he did not anticipate that matters would there reach a final statre. Asked to explain Germany's reason for the exclusion of Lithuania from couuJries ,with whom she was willing to make bilateral non-aggression pacts, Sir John Simon said that the reason given was confined to the present circumstances, and he referred to the difference in connection with Memel. Further asked whether the Government had considered putting down rhe question of Memel on the agenda at the League meeting. Sir John Simon said that the British Government had not waited until now. but had taken up the matter and pressed it on several occasions. At the end of last month it communicated with the French and Italian Governments on the subject, and he hoped shortly to learn more clearly what their views were as the three Governments had a special interest in the Memel question. The Prime Minister was asked whether, in order to remove misapprehensions in German official which, if allowed to continue, must adversely affect Anglo-German relations, his Majesty’s Government would consider the advisability of intimating to the German Government that a transfer to Germany of any colonial mandate by his Majesty’s Government was a matter which it was not in any circumstances prepared to consider. Mr. MacDonald replied that he had no reason to suppose that the German Government was under any such misapprehension. The policy of his Majesty’s Government had been repeatedly and clearly stated by present and previous Governments. Replying to a question in the House of Commons, the Under-Secretary for Air, Sir Philip Sassoon, said that, if all the relative, factors were taken into account, he believed the Royal Air Force had still a margin of superiority over the German air force. Nevertheless, the rate of Germany’s air development was such as to cause the British Government grave concern. The situation would need careful and continuous watchfulness in order that any necessary alterations might be made in the British programme should circumstances so demand. Herr Hitler had claimed parity in numbers with the Royal Air Force, but first-line aircraft was only one of the factors in reckoning the real military efficiency of any air force. A further meeting of Cabinet will be held to-morrow morning before the departure of the Prime Minister and Sir John Simon to Stresa. They will fly as far as Paris in a new de Havilland Dragon Rapide aeroplane acquired for official use.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19350411.2.48.3

Bibliographic details

Dominion, Volume 28, Issue 167, 11 April 1935, Page 7

Word Count
562

NO COMMITMENTS Dominion, Volume 28, Issue 167, 11 April 1935, Page 7

NO COMMITMENTS Dominion, Volume 28, Issue 167, 11 April 1935, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert