Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

CITY OFFICERS’ SALARIES

State Pay Comparisons RESTORATION OF CUTS STRONGLY OPPOSED Opposition to any attempt to restore, at present, the reductions in the salaries of City Corporation officers was expressed at a recent meeting of the executive of the Wellington Ratepayers’ Association. “It may not be generally known,” states the association in a statement to the Press, “that the salaries paid to corporation officers are considerably higher than salaries paid to heads of Government departments and other responsibly placed officers In Government and civil services. As a matter of fact, the city solicitor has a higher salary than the solicitor-general: the town clerk has a higher salary than the public trustee, and a higher salary than the civil service commissioner; the city engineer has a higher salary than the engineer-in-chief (who is also under-secretary, marine engineer and chairman of the Main Highways Board) ; the city valuer is paid a higher salary than the Valuer-General of the Dominion: the city treasurer and ratecollector is paid more than the Commissioner of Taxes; the director of reserves is paid more money by the City Council out of rates than the Commissioner of. Police gets out of the Consolidated Revenue; while the manager of tramways and buses draws out of rates nearly as much as the general manager of railways out of railway revenue. “It is the considered conviction of the Wellington Ratepayers’ Association that the time is quite inopportune for any councillor fo consider seriously the restoration of cuts to City Council officers; the association knows that several officers in the ratepayers’ service would rattier their salaries wore not discussed at tlie present juncture. Should any revision of salaries be undertaken, this association considers that such revision should be in the direction of bringing the salaries paid city officials into eonforpilty with what is adequate under present conditions, and toward a lightening of the already unendurable burdens ratsjayers have now to carry.”

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19340131.2.98

Bibliographic details

Dominion, Volume 27, Issue 108, 31 January 1934, Page 10

Word Count
319

CITY OFFICERS’ SALARIES Dominion, Volume 27, Issue 108, 31 January 1934, Page 10

CITY OFFICERS’ SALARIES Dominion, Volume 27, Issue 108, 31 January 1934, Page 10

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert