GOLD IN KENYA
Problems Arising from Discovery
POSITION OF NATIVE LANDS
(Received Jan. 19, 5.5 p.m.)
Official Wireless. Rugby, Jan. IS. The Colonial Office in an authoritative statement deals with the position of native lands following upon the recent discovery of gold in Kenya. It is explained that in East Africa minerals are the property, not of the occupiers of the land, whether European or native, but of the Crown. Large areas totalling nearlv 31 million acres have from time to time been set aside for the native population, but the creation of such native reserves has in no - way affected the Crown’s ownership of minerals in or under the soil. An ordinance passed in 1930 provided that with the advice and consent of the Central Native Lands Trust Board, tbe Government could exclude from the native reserve land required for such purposes as railways, aerodromes, townships, and waterworks, and for the development of tbe mineral resources of the colony. Where any such exclusion was made, an equivalent area of land was to be added to the reserve.
Meanwhile, a Land Commission, appointed to consider tbe needs, both present and prospective, of the native population in Kenya, in regard to land, .and to report on the desirability and practicability of setting aside further lands for native occupation, has been at work in Kenya since August last. The discovery of gold is of the greatest importance to Kenya as a whole. The local Government has given most careful consideration to the policy to be followed in developing the potential goldfield. On technical aspects it has secured the advice of Sir Albert Kitson, a very eminent geologist of world-wide experience, and in framing the necessary ordinance to deal with the immediate situation it has taken the opinion of the Central Native Lands Trust Board, the Chief Native Commissioner, and the Laud Commission. Moreover, the Governor has taken the wise step of explaining the position to the natives themselves in their tribal gatherings. Every care has been taken to safeguard not only the interests of individuals in the immediate present, but also the ultimate interest of the tribes as a whole in future. The surface actually required for reef mining in Kenya is a matter of acres only, and the total amount of land likely to be excluded from the reserves is relatively very small: Moreover, exclusion is only for the duration of the lease.
A matter of immediate importance is to ensure that any individual native whose holding covers ground required for mining operations shall receive compensation for disturbance and an alternative piece of ground on which he may live and Work in close proximity to his market. The Governor does not contemplate any difficulty in providing individual dispossessed natives with land. Compensation will also be paid to local native funds. Tlie function of the Land Commission is to report on the adequacy of the reserves. and it will take all factors into account, including the requirements of possible mining development. The Government of Kenya has approached the difficult problem in a practical and sympathetic way. It is dealing effectively with the immediate necessity of settling individual natives on whose land gold is found, and when the Land Commission reports, the Government of Kenya and the Government at Home will be able to deal comprehensively with the wider question of the ultimate adequacy of the reserves.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19330120.2.65
Bibliographic details
Dominion, Volume 26, Issue 99, 20 January 1933, Page 9
Word Count
564GOLD IN KENYA Dominion, Volume 26, Issue 99, 20 January 1933, Page 9
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Dominion. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.