Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

CLAIM FOR SUPPORT

Daughter Receives £lOOO FAMILY PROTECTION ACT Giving reserved judgment yesterday in a ease in which Isabella Kinnear Butchart made application for proper maintenance and support out of the estate of her husband, David Butchart, deceased, the Court of Appeal held that New Zealand courts had jurisdiction to make an order under the Family Protection Act, in respect of the immovables in New Zealand of a testator dying domiciled abroad. During the hearing of the case it wan stated that David Butchart died in Dundee, Scotland, in January, 1928, leaving a will in which he bequeathed his whole estate to his niece, Mrs. Annie Paxton. He left a widow and eight children. The widow had come to New Zealand in 1909 with several of her children to join her son, James Butchart, who had settled in Hamilton, and taken up a bakery business there. According to Mrs. Bntcfiart's affidavit the conduct of her husband had compelled her to leave him in 1897. and since then she had neither seen nor heard from him. She had by her own endeavours and those of James Butchart supported the younger members of her family. James Butchart died in August, 1927, a widower, childless and intestate, his whole estate, valued at £BOOO, passing under the Statute of Distribution to his father in Scotland. Shortly after the father was made aware of his accession to the fortune of his son he made a will in favour of his niece. On the death of David Butchart his widow filed the proceedings now before the court, but died before they came on for hearing, and her daughter, Alice Butchart, of Cambridge, spinster, was substituted as plaintiff. The question submitted to the Appeal Court was whether New Zealand courts had jurisdiction under the Family Protection Act to make an order in respect of a movable or immovable estate in. New Zealand of a person who died leaving a will domiciled in Scotland. In its judgment the court expressed the opinon that it could not be. said that, in view of the amount which .the widow received under Scotch law, she had been left without adequate provision. So far as the daughter Alice Butchart was concerned, an order was made that she. be paid out of the land of the testator situated in New Zealand, the sum of £lOOO with interest thereon at six per cent until the date of payment to hen,

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19310718.2.71

Bibliographic details

Dominion, Volume 24, Issue 250, 18 July 1931, Page 9

Word Count
406

CLAIM FOR SUPPORT Dominion, Volume 24, Issue 250, 18 July 1931, Page 9

CLAIM FOR SUPPORT Dominion, Volume 24, Issue 250, 18 July 1931, Page 9

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert