Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

NAVAL PROMOTION

“Free Gangway” Movement

EXISTING WEAKNESSES A committee, of which Vice-Admiral F. Larken is president, lias been'- appointed by the Admiralty to investigate the subject of promotion in the Navy and is now visiting the different home ports and collecting evidence. What the committee is to do principally is to suggest a scheme under which men who join the Navy as bluejackets may be given opportunities of rising to commissioned rank under a better system than now obtains. For many years past the lower deck have been asking for’ what they term a “free gangway”; that is, the chance of obtaining promotion to commissioned rank under conditions similar to those open to the rank and file of the Army. The latter can obtain a commission from the ranks and rise as high as their abilities will carry them. .Field-Mar-shall Sir William Robertson and other distinguished Army officers joined the service as privates.

In the Navy no such’ a career is possible under existing rules. For war service’ll man may be given a commission to which no limitation as to advancement js attached. In practice ibis means little, as such promotion comes but seldom to men when they are at an ago to benefit fully by it. Captain J. 11. Lyne, now retired, is the only officer who has -risen from sailor to captain in lhe Navy in modern times. In the executive and engineering brandies a few young men get commissions under the "mate scheme” which was introduced by Mr. Winston Churchill. But there is a bar to their progress. None of them can rise liigher Ilian the rank of commander —and few attain thiit. Besides. this limited concession is not open to till brunches of the naval personnel—and there are many. The “mute scheme’’ is generally disliked on the ground that it makes a caste distinction ,between the officers commissioned under it and the rest of the quarter-deck. It is hoped that ns an outcome of the Larken Committee this scheme will be abolished and one for giving scope for promotion without restriction ns to how high an cx-blucjnckct officer may rises substituted for it.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19310127.2.4

Bibliographic details

Dominion, Volume 24, Issue 104, 27 January 1931, Page 2

Word Count
357

NAVAL PROMOTION Dominion, Volume 24, Issue 104, 27 January 1931, Page 2

NAVAL PROMOTION Dominion, Volume 24, Issue 104, 27 January 1931, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert