Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

WIVES MISTAKEN

MAN WRONGLY IDENTIFIED

An amazing ease of a body being twice wrongly identified by wives separated from their husbands was disclosed at a West Bromwich inquest, says a London newspaper. The body was discovered mutilated on the railway line at West Bromwich, and was identified by Mrs. Chadwick, of Oldbury, as that of her husband, Joseph Chadwick, a boatman. At the hour fixed for the inquest, however, Chadwick turned up.

Subsequently a Mrs. Smith, of Handsworth, saw the body in the mortuary and not only identified it as that •of her missing husband, Sidney Smith, but produced a letter from him saying that he was fed up and broken hearted. The letter continued: “This week-end will about see me off. I shall try not to make myself known, but if they should know me, put me with my sister, Jessie.”

The Birmingham police disillusioned the woman, for late that night they arrested Smith for being drunk and disorderly, and later he was charged before the Birmingham Justices with the offence.

The police officer, Sergeant James, giving evidence at the inquest, stated that it was the worst case of a mutilated body that he had ever known. Descriptions of the body and the clothing had been circulated over a radius of 50 miles, but without success. He personally was satisfied that there had been no foul play and that the mancommitted suicide.

The Coroner recorded an open verdict on an unknown man who was killed on the line. Without any history concerning the man he could not express an opinion as to how he got there. The Coroner added that it \\as clear from inquiries which had been made in this case that there were many unfortunate women with missing husbands.

“Had I held the inquiry a day earlier, as I intended,” the Coroner continued, “I might well have been satisfied that I was holding it on Mrs. Smith’s husband.”

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19291228.2.168.5

Bibliographic details

Dominion, Volume 23, Issue 80, 28 December 1929, Page 27

Word Count
321

WIVES MISTAKEN Dominion, Volume 23, Issue 80, 28 December 1929, Page 27

WIVES MISTAKEN Dominion, Volume 23, Issue 80, 28 December 1929, Page 27

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert