Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

MAGISTRATE’S COURT

CIVIL LIST Judgment for plaintiff by default was given by Mr. W. G. Bidden, S.M., in the following undefended civil cases yesterd New Zealand Collection Agency and British Imperial Oil Co. (N.Z.) Ltd., v. W. Hart, ±ll3 Os. 8d„ costs £2 10s.; New Zealand Collection Agency Ltd. and British Imperial Oil Co. (N.Z.) Ltd. v. W. Hodges, £lO 13s. od., costs £3; T. H. Oates V. ' AV. H. Pearce, £3 145., costs £1 Bs. bd.; Jack Jacobus v. B. Itutledge, £22, costs £4 Is. 6d.; Shell Co. Ltd. v. D. Renton, £lO, costs £1 ss. Od.; Shell Co. Ltd. y. New Era Printing and Publishing Co. Ltd., £5 13s. Od., costs £1 10s. 6d.; Universal Elim Manufacturing Co. (Australasia) Ltd, v. P. Lee and Fitzherbert, £lO 3s. Jd., costs £2 10s.; H. A. Mason v. It. A. Ponting, £2 6s. 7d., costs £1 4s. Cd.; Shell Co. Ltd. v. J. Smyth, £3 3s 6d., costs £1 used.; S. F. Davies v. D. Tonkin, £4 Sis. 3d., costs £l'3s. Od.; H. E. Ward v. 1. R. Lightfoot, £l, costs Ils.; Shell Co. y. P. Thompson Ltd., £1 125., costs 10s.; Nestle and Anglo-Swiss Condensed Milk Co. (Australasia) Ltd. v. Thomas Lucas and A. Lucas (separate estate), £2 os., costs £1 13s. 6d.; Electrolux Ltd. v. L. A. Berry, £lO, costs £1 10s. 6d.; E. Thomas v. G. Newson, £3O, costs £4 4s. Od.; H. Hayward v. H. Boyd and Mrs. H. Boyd (sep. estate), £l2 10s., costs £- 10s, W. Garbett v. F. Cassln, £62 10s., costs £4 Ils. 6d.; Dominion Mercantile Agency, Ltd. and Munt, Cottrell and Co., Ltd.. v. J. Price, £4 Ils. 3d., costs £1 12s. Cd.; Dominion Mercantile Agency, Ltd. and Campbell Motors, Ltd. v. W. K. 1 utter, costs only, £1 25.; Dominion Mercantile Agency, Ltd. and L. G. Austin v. Av. A. Peprell, 10s. 6d., costs Bs.; Dominion Mercantile Agency, Ltd. and E. Hendra V. J. Prince, 195. /id., costs Ils.; Dominion Mercantile Agency, Ltd. and Dominion Rubber Co., v. A. AV. Lee, £l3 Os. 6d., costs £2 Is. ; Smith and Smith,'Ltd. v. ,T. A. Hill, £oo Bs. 3d., costs £4 Ils. Od.; Dominion Mer-. cantile Agency,- Ltd. and Hutt Valley Electric Power Board v. E. Bridger, £4 135., costs £1 3s. od.; Dominion Mercantile Agency, Ltd. and Kirkcaldie and Stains, Ltd. v. A. E. Hurley, £36 los., costs, £4 Is. 6d.; Dominion Mercantile Agency, Ltd. and H. E. Geddis and Co., Ltd. v. J. Johnson, £0 6s. Bd., costs £1 10s 6d.; Dominion Mercantile Agency, Ltd. and Radford and Co., Ltd. v. F. Marshall, £1 Is. 7d., .costs Bs.; Dominion Mercantile Agency, Ltd. and L. A; Line v. Ay. H. Matthews, £4 12s. 6d., costs £1 6s. 6d. , Dominion Mercantile Agency, Ltd., and 11. E. Geddis and Co., Ltd., v. W. Thomas, £6 125., costs £1 10s. od.; H. H. Price v. Claude Brown, 18s., costs 125.; New Zealand Government Railway Department v. F Crosbv, £6 55., costs £1 10s. Od.; B. Collins, Ltd. v. F. C. Anstls, costs only, £2 3s. 6d.; R. Collins, Ltd. v. A. J. Crawford, £4 10s.,- costs £1 10s. Cd.; A. Pearse V. B. H. Mayall, £26, costs £4 Is. Cd.; A. A. Smith v. W. H. Carlyle, £lO, costs £1 10s. Cd.; Mary Hawkes v. Alfred Walden, £3, costs £1 3s. 6d.; Dommissioner of Taxes V; Frederick Palmer, £3 Is. 3d., costs Bs.: Commissioner of Taxes v Cecil -Mearas Payne, £4 Ils., costs Bs.; Commissioner of Taxes v. Arthur Douglas (Keith Otway, 18s. 2d., costs Bs.; Commissioner of Taxes v. N. AV. Allan Newbold, £1 Bs. Bd., costs Bs.; Commissioner of Taxes v. James Joseph McMahon, £3 Is. 3d., costs 95.; Commissioner of Taxes v Ronald Thomas McLean, £3 Is. 3d., costs 95.; Commissioner of Taxes v. Horace John Moon, £7 13s. Id., costs 195.; Commissioner of Taxes v. Martin John Houlihan, £1 10s. 7d., costs 95.; Commissioner of Taxes v. E. H. Howell. £3 Is. 3d., costs Bs.; Commissioner of Taxes v. John Bernard Hickmott, £3 ®d., xjosts Ils-; 11. S. Sanders v. A. Mcßride, £2B 17s. Cd., costs £4 4s. 6d.: Dominion Mercantile Agency, Ltd. and Walter Stuart v. V. Jacobs., £6 10s. lid., costs £1 Ils. Cd. . Dominion Mercantile Agency, Ltd. and United States Rubber Co., Ltd. v. E. Skeen, £lO, costs £2 os. 6d.; Dominion Mercantile Agency. Ltd. and Aubrey Gualter and Co. v. W. Saussey, 55., costs Bs., H. W. Maunder and Co. v. Natela Radio Co £l7 10s., costs £3 10s.; Dominion Mercantile Agency, Ltd. and Leery and Co., Ltd.' v. P. Thompson, £2 os. Bd.,- costs £1 3s. Cd.; R. Collins, Ltd. y. T. J. Dawson, £4 4s. 9d.. costs £1 ss. 6d.; Hugh Wright v. R. Howe, £lO 14s„ costs £2 145.; R. A. Williamson v. A. W. Tews, i £9 7s. 6d., costs £1 10s. Cd. The largest collection firm in New Zealand is the Dominion Mercantile Agency, Ltd., of Wellington, Auckland, and Christchurch, with agents in every New Zealand town, and associate offices throughout the world.— Advt. ... .

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19280905.2.117

Bibliographic details

Dominion, Volume 21, Issue 288, 5 September 1928, Page 15

Word Count
841

MAGISTRATE’S COURT Dominion, Volume 21, Issue 288, 5 September 1928, Page 15

MAGISTRATE’S COURT Dominion, Volume 21, Issue 288, 5 September 1928, Page 15

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert