Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

HASTINGS “COLD-TEA” CASE’

/A LONG-DELAYED DECISION. By Telegraph.—l’ress Association. 'Hastings, August 'l. The nine-mouths-old "cold tea 1 ' case was brought to a conclusion to-day when charges against Donald Hugh McLeod, licensee of the Hastings Hotel, for selling after'hours, selling liquor to Athol Griftiths, and selling liquor to a person already intoxicated were dismissed. • Attiol Griffiths,. charged with being found on. licensed premises during prohibited hours was lined £2 and costs £3 18s.' (Id. It will be remembered that certain bottles submitted as evidence at the earlier hearing were alleged to contain cold tea and not beer as believed, and the case was adjourned pending an analyses-of the contents. To-day the analyst’s report showed that the contents were not alcoholic and the charges against McLeod were dismissed. Athol Griffiths admitted substituting the liquids. His Worship said the positon of Griffifths was different. He was charged with being found on licensed premises and the onus was on him to’satisfy the Court that, he had a legitimate excuse. Griffiths said he went to see McLeod about- a racehorse which he (the Magistrate) was not going to accept. He had no rightful excuse: it was made up on the spur of the moment. There was a great deal more in tins case than met the eye and be had no hesitation in convicting Griffiths.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19280802.2.150

Bibliographic details

Dominion, Volume 21, Issue 259, 2 August 1928, Page 16

Word Count
220

HASTINGS “COLD-TEA” CASE’ Dominion, Volume 21, Issue 259, 2 August 1928, Page 16

HASTINGS “COLD-TEA” CASE’ Dominion, Volume 21, Issue 259, 2 August 1928, Page 16

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert