STALE MILF
AUCKLAND VENDORS CONVICTED HEAVY FINES THREATENED By Telegraph.—Press Association Auckland, May 28. The failure of milk to stand up to the reductase test for the required period of three hours resulted in the prosecution of three vendors in the Magistrate’s Court. V. N. Hubble appeared for the Health Department. In the case of the Auckland Milk Company, Ltd. (Mr. Grev) a breach was admitted. Mr. Hubble said that since the prominence givn to the reductase test last year, legislation had been introduced to require that a sample should be, treated within four hours of its sale. This was to reduce the possibility of interior deterioration when a solution of methyline blue was applied. Good milk would withstand discolouration for at least three hours. Milk which discoloured in shorter periods was unfit for sale owing to the presence of excessive bacteria. If the test took less than two hours the milk was definitely bad. An inspector had obtained a sample from a shop at Devonport owned by the Auckland Milk Company, Ltd, and the milk withstood the test for only 20 minutes. Mr. Grey said the inspector had been served by a little girl, who had unfortunately drawn on the wrong can. The inspector stated the “little girl” appeared to be at least 24 years of age, Mr. Hunt: If the inspector got bad milk the public would have got it too. Next time I will impose a fine of £25 or £5O. Defendants were fined £lO. A plea of not guilty was entered by james Preston, of Takapuna (Mr. Chalmers) Mr. Hubble said the milk sample had yielded to the reductase test in one hour and a quarter. Inspector White said he had just purchased the milk when defendant arrived with a fresh supply. He told witness he had been delayed with tlie morning’s supply. The Magistrate: If a woman with a sick child had bought the milk slie would have got the ■ old supply. It was a mistake, but I cannot have mistakes with milk. A fine of £5 was imposed. William Young (Mr. E. Dyson), of Broadwav, Newmarket, also pleaded not guil'tv. Evidence was .given that defendant’s milk had succumbed to the test in two hours. Counsel suggested that the milk could have been contaminated during transference to the laboratory. He said tWt defendant’s sales were very small. Defendant was convicted and fined £l.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19260529.2.105
Bibliographic details
Dominion, Volume 19, Issue 208, 29 May 1926, Page 10
Word Count
398STALE MILF Dominion, Volume 19, Issue 208, 29 May 1926, Page 10
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Dominion. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.