Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

FREEZING WORKERS GO SLOW

UNION SECRETARY’S EXPLANATION

There has been a certain amount of curiosity about the instruction of the freezing companies in the south that the slaughterers were not to be allowed to kill more than four sheep per hour instead of the usual twelve per hour. It is understood that this combined action bv the southern companies is intended to counteract the go-slow tactics adopted by the tnen with a view to compelling the companies to grant increased wages. Mr. I’’. C. Ellis, secretary of the Canterbury Freezing Workers* Union, stated the other day (as reported by an exchange) that he bad been informed that at one of the works the men wanted to resume the full killing rate that morning, but the company refused to give them the stock. He understood that the company had the stock available. When asked the reason for the action taken by the men in reducing the output at the works, Mr. Ellis stated that the men were annoyed. They considered that they were rightly entitled to the increase of a penny an hour in accordance with thg last pronouncement of the Arbitration Court, which, in the case of piece-workers, would work out at the rate of 4 per cent. Mr. Kilis said that neither side could approach the Court separately with an application for an amendment of the award. The parties must reach an agreement on the matter first and then make a joint application for the award to be amended. The employers had refused tv agree to the increase in wages, and the union was not able to approach the Court without that agreement.

Tn renly to further inquiries, Mr. Ellis said that he could not say how long the men were prepared to continue diminished killings. He had not heard anv mention of a strike.

The wages earned during the last two seasons, as supplied bv the union to the Arbitration Court, were as fol-lows:—l923-21: Slaughtermen, £5 16s. Id. to £5 ss. 2d.; casing labourers, J 33 17s. lid.; pelt labourers, £3 os. Bd.'; slauehter-house assistants. £3 95., £3 3s. 6d., £1 Is. 1921-25: Slaughtermen, £6 2s. 6d., £5 17s. Id., £5 4s. 4d.; slauirhter-botise assistants, £3 16s, 4d., £3 17s. 2d., £3 4s. 2d., £3 Ils. 6d., £3 Ils. 1-1.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19260114.2.46

Bibliographic details

Dominion, Volume 19, Issue 93, 14 January 1926, Page 6

Word Count
382

FREEZING WORKERS GO SLOW Dominion, Volume 19, Issue 93, 14 January 1926, Page 6

FREEZING WORKERS GO SLOW Dominion, Volume 19, Issue 93, 14 January 1926, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert