Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

WAR MEMORIAL

CITY COUNCIL DONATION £5OOO VOTED 14 was recommended to the City Council last night by the Emance Committee that a donation, of be made towards the erection of the Wellington War Memorial, £2oQO to be placed on next year’s estimate© and the balance to be placed on tn© estimates for the following year. Councillor Aston did not consider that the proposed form of n eniunal would be satisfactory. The Mayor said that the «>t© :n Courtenay PJace, near the Royal Oak Hotel, and the nature of the memorial had been definitely decided upon. The committe© having the matter in hand had raised £9OOO or £lO,OOO, and the council was asked to provide another £5OOO. Councillor Mitchell deprecated th© attitude of those who now opposed th© deliberate decision arrived at yet did not take the trouble to attend th© meetings. Councillor Monteith said that they had a duty to the living as well as th© dead, and compared tho donation or £5OO from the council for the fund to help tho living with the ioOOO to commemorate the dead. On that ground he intended to vote against *the recommendation. The Mayor explained that th© £5OO proposed for the radium, fund was wanted at once and was nJ the council could spare for it. now. .1 here was no intention of discriminating m regard to the two grants. Councillor Luckie considered that Councillor Monteith's remarks- were without due recognition of the position. The proposed memorial was not only a duty to the dead, but a lesson to themselves, their own people, and the generations who would follow. Councillor Chapman thought it was more th© duty of th© citizens to provide the balance of the money required He rather favoured the idea of a utilitarian scheme in preference to a monument, although he yieldedto noon© in his desir© to commemorate the deeds sif the dead or the maimed Councillor Forsyth considered it rather a pity that the matters had been mixed. They owed a duty to the dead for verv many reasons, and n© found no fault with the proposed The recommendation was agreed to.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19231130.2.94

Bibliographic details

Dominion, Volume 18, Issue 56, 30 November 1923, Page 8

Word Count
354

WAR MEMORIAL Dominion, Volume 18, Issue 56, 30 November 1923, Page 8

WAR MEMORIAL Dominion, Volume 18, Issue 56, 30 November 1923, Page 8

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert